Skip to comments.Lindsey Graham gives as good as he gets
Posted on 07/24/2009 8:13:13 AM PDT by STARWISE
click here to read article
ROLF! You couldn't BE any more irrelevant with your spineless stands, Lindseygirl.
Boy, that headline is all kinds of wrong.
South Carolina FReepers: rain holyhell upon this wimp!
Marginalization: the napalm of politics.
you mean the choice of personal pronoun?
Something about this headline gives me the laughing fits...LOL!!
Thank you for your honesty. Please join your brother on the other side of the isle, ASAP.
A Proud CONSERVATIVE who isn't so whimpy and STANDS UP for what she believes in...and feels that DOING THE RIGHT THING ISN'T ALWAYS EASY, BUT IT'S ALWAYS RIGHT!!!
BYE BYE WHEN IT COMES TIME TO RE-ELECT YOUR SORRY BEHIND
He is nothing more than a master of political double speak as the above quote illustrates. McCain and Graham, Specter and so many other rinos are predictable disappointments. Is it really a surprise that republicans are in the minority?
How long has he been in office?
He was present when this disaster took place
Reminder Memo of Grah-amnesty: Remove from Congress in 2010 election.
I cannot stand Miss Lindsay Graham-nesty. The Dems must have a really good file of pictures and video to blackmail this sissy with.
It takes courage to do that, it takes courage to vote knowing it 'might' mean you don't win re-election, but if our troops must stand in the line of fire, in harms way, how can we ask our politicians to show any less courage to simply VOTE based on the law and what is best for the country? Sotomayor is NOT the best we can offer this country.
It isn't about being 'liked'. It is about being 'right'. Most of us left concern for being 'liked' behind when we walked out of the high school door with a diploma in hand.
Why doesnt Lindsey just become a Democrat and get it over with....
Most of all, he said, he wanted to return to the days where ideology was not part of the equation when choosing judicial nominees citing the 98-0 confirmation of Antonin Scalia in 1986 and the 96-3 confirmation of Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 1993.
The sad thing about this RINO's position is that in order to get out of the Judiciary Committee Judge Sotomoyer has to have at least one "Yes" vote from a Republican on the committee. If the Republicans in the Judiciary Committee were unanimous in their dissent, she is rejected.
This is the only way we can defeat her nomination.....and Lindsey Graham is blowing it for the party.
Grahamnesty is the poster boy for the old saying that “If you don’t STAND for something, you’ll FALL for anything.”
The argument by the increasingly silly and irrelevant Lindsey Graham that Sotomayor is no worse than Souter is akin to a doctor telling you that your lung cancer is cured but you have leukemia. I heard Graham remark that The President has a right to get the people he wants. That logic says that if Obama WANTS to abolish an elected legislature for a politbureau of his fellow Chicago thugs which he is in the process of doing with his czars, — you should simply roll over, move on and let him have it.
And this guy is a LAWYER?? Good grief!!
Linsgay earns his kneepad status.
Sen. Grahamnesty’s idea of tough question: “Do you have a temperment problem?” Too bad the metrosexual didn’t have the cajones to ask her about her criminal association in the DeLano matter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.