Unless of course your a supremacist of some sort.
Rove most definitly knows how to get someone elected. And I think hes honest. The problem would be Palins as soon as the media head she was in contact with him. They would paint her as being another Bushie.
Either way it looks silly to be slamming Rove and calling him a traitor. Really silly.
Okay, I’ll admit it, I’m a patriot and I despise any public servant who dishonors their sworn oath to protect and defend our constitution. Oh boy, I’ll be in trouble now for saying that. My understanding for the purpose of the constitutional law is essentially meant to protect this country from those kinds of people. In the true sense of the word “traitor” Carl Rove probably does not fit. However, any public servant who placates to those whose interests are to circumvent that document as well as the will of most true Americans certainly is not a patriot. So in today’s US political world where exactly is the line that defines “traitor”. Not to be haughty, but inherently we know right from wrong, thus it’s what’s right, not who. To anyone with a smidgen of intellect it should be painfully obvious that in order to be successful in DC and for several decades now, the “WHO” takes priority. Anyone who seriously believes that Rove is innocent of placating, as mentioned above, is at least, naive.