[NYer]

Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list

[P-Marlowe]

What a lying SOS.

[dennisw]

Liar or complete moron. I pick liar. A Puerto Rican 0bama

[exnavy]

The Honorable judge thinks only of herself.

[Leisler]

Catholic Latin from big family Puerto Ricans never...never..

?

Liar.

[Moonman62]

“When I asked if an unborn child has any rights whatsoever, I was surprised that she said she had never thought about it,” Sen. DeMint reported.

What does he know? He's just some white male.

[ViLaLuz]

That sentiment in itself is a disturbing thought. She shouldn’t be a judge, period.

[FreeSouthernAmerican]

Just a thought, but seeing as how this is an issue involving an American’s rights in terms of the Constitution and the fact that you will be ruling based on whether it is for or against the Constitution, maybe you should “think about it” Ms. Sotomayor.

[ScottinVA]

Never thought about the rights of the unborn? Why would the liberal wise-a$$ latina consider them? It’s all about the hermanas.

[Ransomed]

Here’s hoping we get a sleeper for our side for once...not likely but you can always hope.

Freegards

[metmom]

She’s never thought, period.....

[ROCKLOBSTER]

Hey Soda!

Are you an alleged Catholic?

Ever heard of the Pope?

Keep talking you lying moron.

[RoadTest]

“Sotomayor says she has ‘never thought about’ rights of unborn, senator reports”

Right, and BO sat and listened to Reverend Wrong for twenty years and never heard a word he said. Yup.

[driftdiver]

If true then she’s too stupid to be confirmed. If she’s n ot telling the truth (is there any doubt really?) then she not worthy.

[muawiyah]

Telling point ~ precedent is of absolutely no concern to the SUPREME court ~ except with respect to how the LOWER courts rule.

Understanding that Sotomayor's statement really means "As a Supreme Court judge I expect my precedental rulings to dominate the entirity of the judiciary in all matters".

So this person who expects to have power equal to her ambitions has also not given any thought at all to the rights of the unborn ~ or probably anybody else in one of the groups she despises, e.g. WHITE MALES.

The woman is a racist and a fascist and not fit to sit on any bench. Who the hell let her in the door?!

[theBuckwheat]

Recall that Roe v. Wade (1973) and Dred Scott v Sanford (1857) have one thing in common: the Court determined in the former that abortion was permitted because the fetus was not a person and in the latter, the Court held that an escaped negro slave was not a person.

[MarkL]

Why would she? The possibility of the unborn having rights would mean that there's the possibility that the unborn IS a person... And if that's the case, then there's no way to avoid the conclusion that aborting a fetus (outside the very real threat to the mother's life) would have to be murder.

Since that is secondary to a pro-abortionist's philosophy of "choice," I see no reason that she would have given it any thought, any more than a slave owner might think that slavery is a horrible, evil thing.

Mark

[NautiNurse]

When I asked if an unborn child has any rights whatsoever, I was surprised that she said she had never thought about it

Willing suspension of disbelief.

[takenoprisoner]

Her false response was simply her smug way of informing DeMint how irrevelent he is to her appointment. Her proceedural obligation was complete once she met with him. From that point, any insight she might determine to offer him would be merely gratuitous.

[Gritty]

This isn't a surprise.

Sotomayer probably hasn't ever thought about the Constitution, either.