Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sotomayor says she has ‘never thought about’ rights of unborn, senator reports
cna ^ | June 13, 2009

Posted on 06/14/2009 5:06:29 AM PDT by NYer

Judge Sonia Sotomayor / Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC)

Washington D.C., Jun 13, 2009 / 07:22 am (CNA).- Supreme Court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor’s views on abortion law and the unborn were topics in several of her meetings with U.S. Senators. One pro-life senator reports that Sotomayor told him she had never thought about the rights of the unborn, while a pro-abortion senator says that she clearly acknowledged to him “the importance of precedent.”

On Tuesday Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) discussed his meeting with Sotomayor.
“We had a good meeting that covered a wide array of issues and Judge Sotomayor was very personable and engaging. However, I didn’t hear anything today that eased my concerns,” he said.

“When I asked if an unborn child has any rights whatsoever, I was surprised that she said she had never thought about it,” Sen. DeMint reported. “This is not just a question about abortion, but about the respect due to human life at all stages, and I hope this is cleared up in her hearings.”

“Those who serve on the highest court in America must have an unwavering commitment to the Constitution and equal justice for all Americans,” he said.

Sen. DeMint also expressed concern about her views on the Second Amendment, which protects the right to bear arms.

On June 2, Sotomayor had a meeting with Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA), who supports legalized abortion. After the meeting, Sen. Feinstein said she felt comfortable that Sotomayor supports the Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade as a precedent.

The nominee also met with Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) on June 3. A supporter of abortion, Wyden told reporters he was “very pleased” that Judge Sotomayor has indicated in the past that she possesses “a great respect for precedent,” Politico says.

He reportedly said he asked specifically about abortion and Roe v. Wade, after which “she acknowledged the importance of precedent… She made that very clear.”


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: scotus; sotomayor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 06/14/2009 5:06:29 AM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; Romulus; ...
Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list


2 posted on 06/14/2009 5:07:07 AM PDT by NYer ("Run from places of sin as from a plague." - St. John Climacus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

What a lying SOS.


3 posted on 06/14/2009 5:07:47 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Liar or complete moron. I pick liar. A Puerto Rican 0bama


4 posted on 06/14/2009 5:09:14 AM PDT by dennisw ("stealth tribal warfare" is what the Sotomayor nomination is about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The Honorable judge thinks only of herself.


5 posted on 06/14/2009 5:12:35 AM PDT by exnavy (I'll keep my God and my guns, the dems can keep the change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

I don’t know. She MIGHT just be a moron instead of a liar. I mean, wouldn’t it take a moron to think they could get away with such a stupid statement?

Oh, wait. I forgot that Obama-Americans don’t seem to be the swiftest people on the planet. Nevermind. They’ll swallow anything she says.


6 posted on 06/14/2009 5:12:41 AM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Catholic Latin from big family Puerto Ricans never...never..

?

Liar.


7 posted on 06/14/2009 5:13:29 AM PDT by Leisler ("It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged."~G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

“had never thought about it”

no brain or no conscience - in the case of the latter, utter evil.


8 posted on 06/14/2009 5:14:19 AM PDT by RebelTXRose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer
“When I asked if an unborn child has any rights whatsoever, I was surprised that she said she had never thought about it,” Sen. DeMint reported.

What does he know? He's just some white male.

9 posted on 06/14/2009 5:15:26 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

That sentiment in itself is a disturbing thought. She shouldn’t be a judge, period.


10 posted on 06/14/2009 5:15:49 AM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Just a thought, but seeing as how this is an issue involving an American’s rights in terms of the Constitution and the fact that you will be ruling based on whether it is for or against the Constitution, maybe you should “think about it” Ms. Sotomayor.


11 posted on 06/14/2009 5:17:30 AM PDT by FreeSouthernAmerican (All we ask is to be let alone----Jefferson Davis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exnavy
The Honorable judge thinks only of herself.

My thoughts exactly. Preborn children can't do anything for her - not even sympathize with the terrible suffering she experienced as the Ivy League-educated child of parents born in Puerto Rico - and therefore, it's reasonable to assume that they never cross her mind.

12 posted on 06/14/2009 5:20:59 AM PDT by Tax-chick (I just had a baby, so I may not respond to your post. Nothing personal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

Probably slept through any sermons on the subject. Either at home or in the pew.


13 posted on 06/14/2009 5:23:14 AM PDT by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Never thought about the rights of the unborn? Why would the liberal wise-a$$ latina consider them? It’s all about the hermanas.


14 posted on 06/14/2009 5:29:26 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Impeach President Soros!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Here’s hoping we get a sleeper for our side for once...not likely but you can always hope.

Freegards


15 posted on 06/14/2009 5:37:12 AM PDT by Ransomed (Son of Ransomed Says Keep the Faith!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

She’s never thought, period.....


16 posted on 06/14/2009 5:50:20 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Hey Soda!

Are you an alleged Catholic?

Ever heard of the Pope?

Keep talking you lying moron.

17 posted on 06/14/2009 5:54:12 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (RATs...nothing more than Bald Haired Hippies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

“Sotomayor says she has ‘never thought about’ rights of unborn, senator reports”

Right, and BO sat and listened to Reverend Wrong for twenty years and never heard a word he said. Yup.


18 posted on 06/14/2009 6:16:17 AM PDT by RoadTest (For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus - I Tim 2:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exnavy

The Honorable judge thinks only of herself.”

That is the FIRST qualification of every NBObama appointee.


19 posted on 06/14/2009 6:16:54 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The fact that a judge said that is disturbing, but she has a point, but when is the last time you saw the rights of the unborn being discussed in the MSM? Liberals won’t even acknowledge that they are future people. The the Pro-Life-Pro-abortion debates only talk about the rights of women and how Republicans want to take away women’s choices.


20 posted on 06/14/2009 6:22:30 AM PDT by Betty Jane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson