Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: djf

It looks like a parody. OTOH, in those days, nudes of women did not look realistic because it was forbidden to paint nudes. But you would think Leonardo would be a bit more familiar with the female anatomy, unless he was celibate or homosexual.


44 posted on 06/12/2009 5:43:36 PM PDT by Judges Gone Wild (Who is this uncircumcised, to oppose the armies of The Living God?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Judges Gone Wild

He WAS celibate, hence, speculation he was homosexual. I don’t buy it.


46 posted on 06/12/2009 6:08:21 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Judges Gone Wild

I think he painted a nude guy, and added the breasts and the hairdo.


53 posted on 06/12/2009 7:22:10 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson