Actually, you are the one who continues to 'misconstrues' the words of Hoyle and Einstein. You have effectively proved that you put almost no thought into your statements as a rule.
"Can you not answer these extremely simple questions without sending me to read a pseudoscience site? How can you launch a probe to Jupiter without taking the sun's gravity into account? How?"
Neither I nor the people at these sites ever said anything to give you the idea that you could launch a probe to Jupiter without taking the sun's gravity into account? This tells me that you are either incapable or unwilling of understanding the issue.
"Also, I'm sure you read the final report on the Gravity Probe B that said that frame dragging is plainly visible in the processed data. All those wasted posts from you that tried to use NASA work to back up your 15th century theory. Shameful."
Had you understood what Einstein, Hoyly, Born and Ellis actually said, you would have been embarrassed at your statement above. They said that geocentrism was completely consistent w/ GR. So, your claim that Gravity Probe B found 'frame dragging' consistent w/ GR is simply irrelevant.
You inability to understand the issue is what is shameful.
Several years ago you claimed that the Gravity Probe B was evidence for a geocentric solar system based on the fact that no frame dragging was found. You were proven wrong.
Geocentrists are one level above the Flat Earth Society and just below Scientology.
The ridiculousness of your claims make some anti-evolutionist folks even doubt your existence; they claim pro-Darwin folks made you up to make them look bad! See post 54.