What then do you think of the rights our founding fathers incorporated into our nation that established religious liberty? Is that similarly the “politically correct liberal/atheist” position.
What is most important to you, apparently, is that your weak faith be buttressed at every possible angle.
The purpose of science class is not to buttress the faith of those weak of spirit and weak of mind, it is to teach them science.
Interjecting God into the discourse is absolutely useless as it doesn't add anything of value to those who already know that God created everything, and it will only drive away those who wish to learn about science but do not share my belief in Jesus the Christ.
I taught Science to people of all religious faiths. I suppose according to you I should have show any non-Christians the door? Told them their theology was not compatible with learning, knowing, understanding and using science? That would be a lie.
I leave the lies and perjury to the Creationists.
Taking the position of sterilizing God from science for science’s sake is the liberal politically correct/atheist position. It’s really not that hard to grasp, particularly on a site called Free Republic. Perhaps a review for you from Jim Robinson is in order.
Again.
The Founding Fathers would scold you for your views. You’ve twisted it to incorporate liberalism, Christianity should be silenced in order for muslims and hindus and everybody else to feel good about themselves.
To say nothing of how antithetical this is to the Christian calling. We’re called to share the Truth, the Gospel. It stands to reason that an omnipresent, omniscient, omnipotent Christian God has a place in His creation, which of course includes science class.
The issue isn’t proselytizing, or theology in science class, rather the extraoridnary lengths the godless will go to to stamp out any mention of His name, even when an innocent child asks an innocent question about her teeth.
It’s not weak to stand up for Christ at every possible angle. PARTICULARLY when a child is asking a simple question, again for you people to prattle on endlessly about science and religion to be so compatable, you go to extraordinary lengths to defeat your own argument.
The little girl’s question has absolutely nothing to do with hinduism or any other strawman you bring up.
Again, it’s not that difficult a concept to grasp allmendream.
Either evolution is God’s intelligent design and children should be privvy to this or not. The lengths you go to deny this make it crystal clear whom has the weak faith here.
A Christian person understands science taught with a Godly perspective is what leads to a moral undertaking. Something sorely lacking in our society as it is and something that escapes evolution apologists that require the fraud of peer review of like-minded God deniers to prop up their weak faith in Godless science.
One who goes to extraordinary lengths to hide God from children for the sake of godless science and calls himself a Christian, then has the audacity to call creationsists liars when their liberal position gets exposed, has no place on FR, IMHO.