Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Obligation to retreat? I would think one’s home is the retreat, and anybody who violates it can be justifiably destroyed.
That’s my rule for insects as well.


2 posted on 04/22/2009 3:54:02 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast ( AR2, Overdue! = American Revolution II...Overdue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

I also think it’s outrageous that the current law here requires you to hand over your valuables to a robber without resisting with deadly force IF you believe he won’t hurt you. Stupid.


3 posted on 04/22/2009 3:58:17 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
What you said:

"Obligation to retreat? I would think one’s home is the retreat, and anybody who violates it can be justifiably destroyed."

What the article said:

"However, an individual is not obliged to retreat from his home."

It appears to me you don't have to retreat from your home. The law must mean if you are out and about somewhere other than your home and can safely retreat.
5 posted on 04/22/2009 10:08:25 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden (iIt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson