You said — To paranoid conspiracy theorists, anyone who disagrees with them sounds like a government shill. Again, par for the course.
—
It could be Jesus Christ himself saying it and your statement would work the same way for you... the way you think about it... :-)
It could be Jesus Christ himself saying it and your statement would work the same way for you... the way you think about it... :-)
________
Doesn’t the same apply to you?? I don’t see you changing your position either, logic isn’t your strong suit.
The evidence against Oswald is stronger than the O.J. Murder case, you just haven’t bothered to read about it or watch the modern, scientific recreations done the same way they would be in a modern murder case. I have no doubt in my mind that Oswald did it, alone.
You have no doubt that it’s a conspiracy, why am I a rigid fundamentalist which is your current tack since government shill didn’t work out? I came to my conclusion based on the best evidence, Oswald’s history, modern forensics and the wholesale debunking of every last part of every conspiracy tale connected with the assasination.
Just like liberals generally know nothing about politics when you debate them, conspiracy people like yourself know little of the assasination except to repeat lies that have been debunked years ago.
The difference is if I cared to I know how to debate as a liberal or as a conservative, as with the assasination I know all of the conspiracy talking points AS WELL AS the arguments, facts, logic and evidence that smash the conspiracy theories to smithereens.
You don’t even know both sides of the assasination argument, only the conspiracy talking points, that’s why it’s an exercise in futility to debate liberals or conspiracy theorists. They’re too lazy to look at both sides, it is you who is rigid and wild-eyed with your illogical point of view, not I.