Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi made it official to ABC: ‘We want registration.’
http://www.examiner.com ^ | April 8, 2009, 9:53 AM | Dave Workman

Posted on 04/09/2009 10:06:19 AM PDT by ebiskit

Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi dropped a verbal bombshell in the middle of an interview on Good Morning America April 7, and surprisingly, neither the press nor a majority of gun rights activists seemed to notice. Responding to a question from ABC’s Robin Roberts, Pelosi said that while Congress apparently does not want to take anyone’s guns away, “We want them registered.”

Roberts: Under the Bush administration, you pretty much said the ball was in their court when it came to reinstating the ban. Now, it's a Democratic President, a Democratic House. So, is the ball in your court where this is concerned?

Pelosi: Yes, it is. And we are just going to have to work together to come to some resolution because the court, in the meantime, in recent months, the Supreme Court has ruled in a very- in a direction that gives more opportunity for people to have guns. We never denied that right. We don't want to take their guns away. We want them registered. We don’t want them crossing state lines...

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; 2a; 2ndamendment; abcdisneynews; agenda; america2point0; asocialistamerica; assaultweaponsban; awb; banglist; congress; cwii; democratcongress; democrats; donttreadonme; freedom; gunban; guncontrol; holder; hr45; liberty; lping; microstamping; obama; pelosi; pravdamedia; registration; serialization; shallnotbeinfringed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-238 next last
To: ebiskit
We don't want to take their guns away. We want them registered. We don’t want them crossing state lines...

Salami tactics...like the good little fascist she is.

61 posted on 04/09/2009 10:34:07 AM PDT by Petronski (For the next few years, Gethsemane will not be marginal. We will know that garden. -- Cdl. Stafford)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dallascsr
Watch the “20/20” special....

I spend almost 200/mo on cable, I'll be damned if I'll watch that politically leftist directed drivel from the likes of "20/20"!

I appreciate the reminder however dallascsr. : )

62 posted on 04/09/2009 10:35:05 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, Question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Domandred
I want my president to register an undergo background checks too.

SAYING you were born a citizen doesn't pass muster any more than SAYING you've always been a Christian (and yet were never baptized).

63 posted on 04/09/2009 10:36:03 AM PDT by a fool in paradise ( “Saving the New York Times now ranks with saving Darfur as a high-minded cause.”NYTimes Bill Kell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

64 posted on 04/09/2009 10:36:25 AM PDT by Leisler ("It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged."~G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh

You can count on the two of us in that group. We are moving from North Dakota to Arizona and we are taking more than one firearm across several state lines. We defy Nancy Pelosi or any other(s) to prevent said movement. Just what despotism does she envision we are living under? Words fail me in politely expressing my disgust with San Fran Nan. (Further expression self-censored.)


65 posted on 04/09/2009 10:40:19 AM PDT by HattonFarmer (Fear the government that fears your gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh
No. Not ever. "Shall not be infringed" means what it says. Got a problem with that, Ms. Pelosi?

Gee, now where does that offensive talk come from?

Of course she G-D D#mn well has a problem with it and is fully focused on neutering the Constitution and she isn't the only one trying!

We need to be active in defending the Constitution in real time as sad as it is.

66 posted on 04/09/2009 10:41:31 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, Question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ebiskit

Registration is Confiscation.

As for the evil witch Pelosi, she doesn’t read the mood of the “real world”. She comes from a failed socialist state that doesn’t remotely resemble the rest of the US.

That’s okay, because at this rate, any and everyone that signs on to her gun grab will be removed from office. We will eventually purge the Congress and will hand her rearend to her on a platter. I look forward to the day. I am patient and persistent. And I have a long memory.

Our country has become a joke with these marxists in power. Nothing good or bad lasts forever. I am putting my bets on the Constitution.


67 posted on 04/09/2009 10:41:44 AM PDT by BlessingsofLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

LOL! Come on Pelosi - go for it. Go for regsitration. My guess is it would be good for about 100 House seats in 2010.

I read yesterday that McCain/Bush carried districts now held by Dems in the House to the tune of about 69 districts.


68 posted on 04/09/2009 10:42:04 AM PDT by Frantzie (Boycott GE - they own NBC, MSNBC, CNBC & Universal. Boycott Disney - they own ABC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ebiskit
who here remembers a bunch of folks saying, just a few months ago, "Don't worry, HR45 (Bobby Rush's Firearm Licensing bill) can't ever happen"?

Wanna bet?

69 posted on 04/09/2009 10:44:06 AM PDT by Zeddicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

This stupid Pelosi woman should get busy and catch all the criminals first ~ but she’s not going to do that. Her own father was a criminal and she feels that would dishonor his name.


70 posted on 04/09/2009 10:45:54 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ebiskit
Did not the Jewish people have to register prior to the holocaust?

Yup. And we register sex offenders today. Nobody here is going to complain about that... but the precedent has been set and it won't stop there. Wait until they decide to register gun owners and other "undesirables." In the name of public safety, just like the Nazis did.

When you take away others' rights without due process of law, you've given your own rights away.

71 posted on 04/09/2009 10:46:18 AM PDT by Clint Williams (Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters | America -- a great idea, didn't last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
"There is no purpose for registration other than confiscation."

Bingo!!!

72 posted on 04/09/2009 10:47:49 AM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ebiskit

Response to Piglosi: We want your bodyguards and escorts disarmed. May she be forced to drink swine urine.


73 posted on 04/09/2009 10:47:56 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot ((Freedom's Precious Metals: Gold, Silver and Lead))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlessingsofLiberty
Registration is Confiscation.

It is a way to define who is working for who....you serf.

74 posted on 04/09/2009 10:48:25 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, Question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh
No. Not ever. "Shall not be infringed" means what it says.

It's already been infringed. For a long, long time. Your personal definition doesn't fly. Try again.

75 posted on 04/09/2009 10:49:14 AM PDT by Clint Williams (Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters | America -- a great idea, didn't last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Clint Williams

Uhhhhhh, you are comparing sex offenders to law abiding citizens???

grrrrrrrrrrrrrr

Get a grip dude. You just fell off the radar screen. sheesh


76 posted on 04/09/2009 10:49:55 AM PDT by BlessingsofLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: TrueKnightGalahad
Is there anyone on this site who is surprised by this? To all of you who sat on your hands to 'punish' Republican candidates who were less-than-perfect, and thus delivered us all into the hell of a Dim-controlled WH and Congress, here is yet more evidence of the damage you have wreaked on our country. The Teleprompter-in-Chief has already voiced his intention of starting down the road of US disarmament; if our soldiers will be denied arms, how much less important are we mere subjects of his Infernal Majesty? Forget Tea Parties - we should be having Slap-An-Obama-Voter Parties...and Slap-Obama-Enabler (you know who you are!) Parties, too.

Tell us how you really feeeeel. ;-)

I guess it can happen here.

Amazing << Hear this. Feel this, and tell me that this isn't music.

Oh, dear...


77 posted on 04/09/2009 10:51:10 AM PDT by rdb3 (The mouth is the exhaust pipe of the heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Sig Sauer P220
"How would you like 10 or 15 million armed citizens ringing the Capitol? Try us."
They seem to be inviting just that very thing.

Yawn. Call me when they start marching. And not a second before.

78 posted on 04/09/2009 10:51:31 AM PDT by Clint Williams (Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters | America -- a great idea, didn't last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ebiskit

Sorry. I sold all my guns in private transactions.


79 posted on 04/09/2009 10:52:03 AM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebiskit
Yeah, right. You're full of 'carp'. We've seen this movie Nan.

In the late 60's / early 70's Chicago was still somewhat 'Gun Friendly'. And then one day old man Daley "just wanted handguns to be registered". BUT - by 1985 Handguns were basically OUTLAWED as no more NEW handgun registrations were being accepted by the CPD. Only those handguns registered in or prior to 1984 were 'allowed' to be renewed. (Handguns had to be re registered annually)

Oh really? Now what part of the Constitution allows you to OUTLAW interstate commerce of a Legal Product? In case you haven't looked ya commie beech, the Interstate Commerce Clause allows you to 'Regulate' Commerce, not to OUTLAW 'it' (a legal product).

And you just might want to talk to your commie cohort, Di-Fi. She's had some experience with Commerce Clause Abuse and that SCOTUS thingy we have. Her experience wasn't good (She's still ticked because "her intent was good and it was 'for the children'."). Oh and then there's that whole "shall NOT be infringed" thang.

80 posted on 04/09/2009 10:52:31 AM PDT by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-238 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson