Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: glock rocks; Wonder Warthog
You might want to look at 160.
163 posted on 02/19/2009 8:25:47 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The fouth estate is the fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie
"You might want to look at 160."

I looked. The points are all baloney. And if the law REQUIRES you to allow firearms in vehicles, then you're off the legal hook for all of them.

"The point is, there are issues in this tension between a private landowner and the owner of a weapon desiring to leave it in his car. Frankly, as a business owner, I'd feel safer if he carried it into the building and checked it at the door."

Why???

"Wouldn't you?"

No.

"But then, how would you feel handing a loaded weapon to a guy you just fired?"

If the termination was fairly done and handled humanely, why would there be a problem. And if the terminee is deranged, your "no weapons on company grounds" will simply be ignored. This is the standard anti-gun BS. If the guy is planning to kill you, why is he going to follow any such rule???

175 posted on 02/20/2009 2:45:06 AM PST by Wonder Warthog ( The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson