Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Keyes v. Bowen, Obama, Biden OPPOSITION TO RESPONENTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO ^ | Feb. 11, 2009 | Gary G. Kreep

Posted on 02/15/2009 11:13:46 PM PST by SvenMagnussen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Frantzie
As soon as the Deniers learn Keyes has standing and damages. LOL! Enjoy.

Pigs will fly before that happens. The cases will all be dismissed in good time. Anyone who thinks otherwise is deluding himself.

In the mean time, Bambi will be the one laughing as all these tinfoil hat lawsuits distract the nation from the damage his policies are doing.

Take off the tinfoil, stop tilting at windmills, and do something substantive to oppose those policies.

Instead of throwing your money down the crapper by giving it to Berg or Orly, donate to the National Right to Work Foundation to oppose card check. Instead of wasting time on birther nonsense, sign a petition and call every congressman and senator you can to oppose Porkulus.

21 posted on 02/16/2009 3:56:04 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

The dagger through heart of a denier ...

“... courts have held that a candidate or his political party has standing to challenge the inclusion of an allegedly ineligible rival on the ballot, on the theory that doing so hurts the candidate’s or party’s own chances of prevailing in the election (See, e.g., Tex. Dem. Party v. Bcnkiser, 459 F.3d 582, 586-87 & n. 4 (5th Cir.2006); Schulz v. Williams, 44 F.3d 48, 53 (2d Cir.1994); Fulani v, Hogsett, 917 F.2d 1028, 1030 (7th Cir.1990)). Because there are unresolved questions regarding OBAMA’ S eligibility for the Office of President and since KEYES was a candidate and competitor against OBAMA for that office, KEYES’ chance of winning the Presidential election was unfairly hurt by OBAMA if he was an ineligible rival.”

Keyes has standing. When will Obama stop trying to wiggle out of it on a technicality and start formulating an appropriate response to the allegation he’s not eligible?


22 posted on 02/16/2009 5:18:29 PM PST by SvenMagnussen (Change is coming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
Photobucket
23 posted on 02/16/2009 5:26:40 PM PST by IrishPennant ("We're surrounded...That simplifies our problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen; EternalVigilance
...because there are unresolved questions regarding OBAMA’ S eligibility for the Office of President and since KEYES was a candidate and competitor against OBAMA for that office, KEYES’ chance of winning the Presidential election was unfairly hurt by OBAMA if he was an ineligible rival.”

Bhwahahahahahhah! Alan Keyes chances of winning hurt? ROFLOL.

I'm sorry, that's got to be the funniest thing I've read on FR in a long time.

How can your chances of winning be hurt when they are already zero to begin with?

Just when I thought Keyes couldn't say anything more nutty, he proves me wrong yet again!

This case is going to get laughed out of court. Keyes has never had any standing and never will.

24 posted on 02/16/2009 11:26:44 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen
Keyes has standing.

LOL. See post 24.

When will Obama stop trying to wiggle out of it on a technicality and start formulating an appropriate response to the allegation he’s not eligible?

He has already proved his eligibility beyond a reasonable doubt.

25 posted on 02/17/2009 9:08:11 AM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

There have been several times in my life that people told me I could not do something, it would never happen, I shouldn’t even try.

One of the most significant was a piece of legislation in a state legislature. We were told it would never pass. My own state representative told me that I would never be able to persuade him to vote for it because of his prior occupation. That was after the first letter. After the second letter, he did wait to vote last, but he did vote for it and he did it in exactly the way I suggested to him. We got the votes of every representative in both chambers save five people.

I also didn’t think that there was much chance of stopping immigration reform during Bush 2, but people did stop it, and many freepers were involved.

Don’t say it can’t be done. Especially not to me. With effort and faith and prayer, it can be done. I don’t know which one of all the avenues that are being used will finally get it done, but it will get done.

Saying that Obama has proved his eligibility beyond a reasonable doubt is a negative measure of your intelligence and character.


26 posted on 02/17/2009 6:26:00 PM PST by daylilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

I think most of us are doing all those things. We’re joining Committees of Safety, organizing in our communities (just like King Hussein!), handing out flyers, talking to people about the country’s problems and the evil of socialism, working at our professions and being good citizens. We all stood up to object to the Porkulus. But we still have a right to know whether or not the person acting as “president” is qualified to be there.

If someone asked you for your birth certificate or college records and it meant that you could qualify for the most prestigious job in the world, wouldn’t you release them? What about the FOIA? I’m writing to the State Dept. tomorrow to request Obama’s records. They’re supposed to be publicly available!


27 posted on 02/17/2009 7:26:02 PM PST by newenglandpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: newenglandpatriot

The Freedom of Information Act, Patients Rights and privacy laws, not to mention our rights under the Constitution and the Bill of Rights are all being trampled by the Obama administration. And, I predict there will be more ignored/ or scoffed at before he is through.
He has made good on his promise to form a national civil police force with the powers of the military, and he didn’t waste any time, either. Of what is he afraid? If you haven’t already done so, read the DoD Directive #1404.10, dated 1/23/2009. Then, go back and read between the lines.
This directive is an outrage.
For those who sign on to the Civilian Expeditionary Workforce, understand that when you are called to service it will be against friends and relatives who recognise this directive for what it really is. Understand, too, that you will have earned your new title of being a 21st Centruy Brown Shirt, and a proud member of the new world order. Just remember, stand up straight and “sieg heil!”


28 posted on 02/19/2009 9:43:33 PM PST by Jojo1958 (A Patriot for Truth in Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: All
Dr. Orly -- WRITE EMAILS TO GET ORLY ON TV http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/02/20/letters-needed-to-the-world-over-with-raymond-arroyo-in-ewtn.aspx Letters Needed to The World Over with Raymond Arroyo, in EWTN Dear Citizens, We need to get Orly on TV, one show at a time. Unfortunately only a very small minority of American citizens know that Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen, and we, you and me, need to change that PRONTO. The first TV show for Orly should be The World Over with Raymond Arroyo, in EWTN. Orly told me that she would love to appear in that show. Why that show? It is outside the networks, it has over 100 million viewers worldwide, tens of millions of viewers in the United States , and the host, Raymond Arroyo, is unapologetically critical of Obama. Mr. Arroyo has opened the doors for us, especially for us. At the end of his last show, he said that once a month he will interview one guest selected by the viewers via email. Thatʼs us. I need 3000, yes thatʼs three thousand, of you to send an email to raymond@raymondarroyo.com with only the word: Topics in the subject line. Those are his specific instructions. In the email (please be very polite) tell Raymond that you want him to interview Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., the lawyer who has a case pending in the United States Supreme Court challenging Obamaʼs Natural Born Citizenship. If we get her on TV, and tens of millions of Americans watch what she has to say, then the cat is out of the bag. This site has three hundred and fifty thousand (350,000) hits per week; I only need three thousand of you. I need three thousand Patriots to step forward. Please do your share. Help her! Step forward! Sincerely, Carlos Vazquez
29 posted on 02/20/2009 8:39:12 AM PST by patriot08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson