Sure he did. From the introduction:
“all evolution as described above is genetically impossible...life started with the creation of ancestral types (for instance the ancestral wolf, the ancestral oxen and the ancestral man)...their variants can never evolve beyond the natural borders of their type...a new species is genetically poorer, or is even a form of degeneration compared to their ancestors...over time genetic information is lost instead of gained
That doesn’t define it, it just says it is lost over time.
Does he mean genome size, gene number, genetic variation?
All can go up and has been observed to go up in expanding populations.
Do you hold to “new species” triple G?
What would you call that process whereby new species arise from “ancestral types”?
A scientist would define it as evolution.
What would you call it?