[GodGunsGuts]

==Right... the idiot didn’t even define “genetical richness”.

Don’t get upset just because he has evidence to back up his theory and Darwinian evolution doesn’t. And btw, you might want to consult a dictionary the next time you decide a science term is not a word:

Adj. 1. genetical - of or relating to or produced by or being a gene; “genic combinations”; “genetic code”
genic, genetic

2. genetical - of or relating to the science of genetics; “genetic research”
genetic

[allmendream]

There was no evidence, there was no data, genetical is not a word that biologists use, Free Republic doesn't recognize it as a word, Word doesn't recognize it as a word and recommends you use genetically, it is not in common usage among people who know or discuss science, nor did the idiot define it.

An increasing population has increasing genetic diversity or “genetical richness”.

If you think the human population was once two individuals then the maximum genetic diversity at any loci was four. There is a lot more than just four alleles at many loci. Where do you suppose this “genetical richness” came from?