[[And yet, all of the available evidence shows that evolution of species is a fact.]]
Really? What an incredible statement- Fact eh? And what are you basing this claim on? No credible scientist would make htis claim, but you have, so what are you basing your claim on? Assumptions? Because that’s all the evidence that supposedly support evolution. Assumptions! Fact? No- Relgious beleif that defies science? YES!
[[You’re the one claiming that scientists have created hoaxes to bolster the TOE- provide some evidence of that, if you can.]]
Practically every claim such as those of hte peppered moth, the ‘feathered dino’ (that didn’t have feathers, but MODIFIED SCALES that in NO way represented feathers, or even proto feathers as was CLAIMED), Eukorote ‘evolution’ practically every aspect is a hoax meant ot bolster macroevolution claims- When examined, it is exposed as nothign but an unsupported claim that defies the actual science- Fish to tetrapod claims is ALSO another fraud with NO evidence to support such claims- it’s a claim meant to bolster macroevolutionary claims and it has NO sscientific support- Cynodonts being related to later creatures- again NO evidence to support htis- just claims made trying to bolster the evolutionary ‘bush’ hypothesis- Embryos- another deliberate hoax- taught as fact for many many years- it was NOT fact- it was a hoax! Symibiotic relationships which Macroevolutionists tried passing off as ‘Evolution in action’- Deliberate hoaxes meant ot deceive hte public and bolster macoervolution- On and on it goes-
Yes. Evolution of species is a fact. The TOE is the scientific theory that explains that fact.
Practically every claim such as those of hte peppered moth
What's wrong with the peppered moth?
‘feathered dino’
Creationists hate Archaeopteryx because it is a great example of one of those transitionals they insist does not exist.
‘evolution’ practically every aspect is a hoax meant ot bolster macroevolution claims
You keep using the word "hoax" as if it means "conclusion CottShop disagrees with." I think that's your problem- you don't agree with the TOE, so the only way for you to dismiss the mountains of evidence to the contrary is to claim it is all a hoax.
Sorry, you don't get to change definitions of words.