There's not enough evidence to come to a conclusion on that. There are some theories, but none that have reached a scientific consensus.
There is NO theory to develop if there is no HOT steamy pot of primordial pond scum.
I'll say again- the TOE does not deal with the origins of life. Your snide comment about primordial pond scum doesn't change that fact. You're creating a straw man that I have no desire to defend.
Please. LIFE is here, man in the flesh as it is now can be fairly well dated. Earth, however, was here and had been here long before flesh man was formed. There is NO need to design or create theories with regards to how flesh man is here upon this earth. Note I did not say there was no desire because it has since the beginning to design something anything to disregard the Heavenly Father to be who He was from the beginning, the Origin. There is nothing new under the sun, nothing modern about it.
There is NO theory to develop if there is no HOT steamy pot of primordial pond scum.
I'll say again- the TOE does not deal with the origins of life. Your snide comment about primordial pond scum doesn't change that fact. You're creating a straw man that I have no desire to defend.
There is nothing snide about my comment when everything you promoters of TOE on FR hide themselves from, the most common thing about Darwin, planted everywhere else has to do with a hot steamy pot of primordial soup.
The only reason that evolutionists won’t discuss abiogenesis in connection with evolution is because it’s the very thing that they’ve been demanding- the scientific evidence that disproves the ToE. So they have to make an arbitrary distinction between whatever preceded the first cell; that thing that the first cell evolved from, and the first cell itself.
It’s intellectually dishonest to exclude part of the process from the process itself to try to *prove* that the process works. It only *works* if you ignore how it started.