Posted on 01/26/2009 7:55:12 AM PST by IMissPresidentReagan
L0L!
re 379....Hope so...his fans and callers give him touch on the pulse a lot of times. I have heard about Zycam from others....but the Ditto Cam always makes me feel better.
Linky no worky
By Jeff Mason Jeff Mason 62 mins ago
=====
=====
Coincidence?
Damn dams.
Whats coming out of the Oval Office and Congress now...
Brown stinky water
Obama’s hoax promoters better get their stories straight:
Steven Chu, In an interview with The Post last year, said that the cost of electricity was “anomalously low” in the United States, that a cap-and-trade approach to limiting greenhouse gases “is an absolutely non-partisan issue,”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/11/AR2008121103380.html
<>
James Hansen wants Obama to just come out and admit that it is an energy tax that he wants to impose on Americans and stop beating around the bushes by calling it “cap and trade”. He says that Americans will “understand”: Some on Left Join Fight to Expose the Lie that is Cap and Trade
http://blog.heritage.org/2008/12/05/some-on-left-join-fight-to-expose-the-lie-that-is-cap-and-trade/
<>
Dr. Higgs reminds us as to just who is, and who is not qualified to speak on various scientific and economic matters:
Peer Review, Publication in Top Journals, Scientific Consensus, and So Forth
http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=1963
Robert Higgs
<>
Europe Puts Hurdles in Obama’s Climate Path
By Gregor Peter Schmitz in Washington D.C.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,595644,00.html
<>
231-Page Report Now Available
Scientists Continue to Debunk ?Consensus? in 2008 Only 52 Scientists Participated in UN IPCC Summary
Proponents of man-made global warming like to note how the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) and the American Meteorological Society (AMS) have issued statements endorsing the so-called “consensus” view that man is driving global warming. But both the NAS and AMS never allowed member scientists to directly vote on these climate statements. Essentially, only two dozen or so members on the governing boards of these institutions produced the “consensus” statements. This report gives a voice to the rank-and-file scientists who were shut out of the process.
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=2674e64f-802a-23ad-490b-bd9faf4dcdb7
I’ll let people from that state vote on that
Carbon Credits - Got my boy in trouble at school. Asked teacher how long would it take the earth to return to normal if all the humans left. She just blinked at him.
BTW: Good thread for those worried about Obama
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2171154/posts?page=1
Yea, everyone laughed, while the the Stasi was staring them down.
BRAVO!!
I IS HERE!!!!
Any sllort to deal with like yesterday???
brilliant.................just brilliant
Rush is on fire still....this has been a great three hours so far.
100 to 000, and the wining team’s coach gets fired, 180 degrees out of phase...
Just sent this out. If it is useful to you, you may use it.
This is the Obama/Limbaugh Bi-Partisan Economic Stimulus Compromise Plan of 2009
(You may remember that Obama said he “didnt care where the suggestions [to fix the economy] come from, all will be weighted...”)
This proposal is dead serious. Here is the plan:
Obama won the election with 54% of the vote, compared to 46% for McCain.
PROPOSED: The US will invest 1 Trillion Dollars (One Thousand Billion Dollars) to end the recession by stimulating the economy.
54% invested Obamas way: spending - $540 Billion. Obama’s way gets the majority of the funds, reflecting the outcome of the election.
46% invested the Republican’s way: tax cuts, specifically capital gains cuts and business tax relief, plus other tax payer reductions - $46 Billion
These different approaches will be implemented at the same time and we can measurably compare which plan makes the economy improves the fastest. We won’t have all our eggs in one basket and we will know for future reference which approach better stimulates the economy, spending or tax cuts. If a combination of the two works best, great. We will know for sure.
This bill is truly bipartisan and reflects the wishes of *all* the American people, both those who voted for Obama and those who didn’t. This is true bi-partisanship. As Obama said, everyone will “have some skin in the game.”
Will you support this bi-partisan approach to ending the recession? Talk to your friends and neighbors. Forward this email.
We’re all in this together. Let’s solve it together.
Fewer Americans being born = more immigrants from wherever. Liberal thinking just boggles the mind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.