Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cyropaedia
If you cannot actually qualify, then you are prohibited holding the office. Pretty simple logic.

I understand and agree.

Kevmo asserts that because there is no further law defining the terms of the Constitutional prohibition against quartering of soldiers in private homes, there likewise need be no law setting out a process for verifying the qualifications of a presidential candidate.

The 3rd Amendment reads No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. Although there is no clarifying court ruling* or law further defining conditions, the amendment clearly leaves an opening for laws to be enacted.

*Actually there is one court ruling, Engblom v. Carey.

1,133 posted on 01/17/2009 10:05:49 PM PST by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1128 | View Replies ]


To: lucysmom; Kevmo
What Kevmo is asserting is that it incumbent up the candidate to prove that he fully meets the Constitutional requirements required.

This means releasing a certified copy of your long form Birth Certificate as opposed to a Certification of Live Birth which could still be obtained if the birth took place outside of the State and merely provides the information submitted by applicant himself (or herself).

1,136 posted on 01/17/2009 10:31:33 PM PST by Cyropaedia ("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson