Belief that the CoLB scanned and published on the internet is a forgery is a matter of faith.
Sandra Ramsey Lines writes; Upon a cursory inspection of the internet COLB, one aspect of the image that is clearly questionable is the obliteration of the Certificate No. That number is a tracking number that would allow anyone to ask the question, “Does this number refer to the Certification of Live Birth for the child Barack Hussein Obama II?" It would not reveal any further personal information; therefore, there would be no justifiable reason for oliterating it.
Well, the number is not blacked out on the images posted on the factcheck site. Check it out for yourself
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html
Belief that the CoLB scanned and published on the internet is a forgery is a matter of faith.
***There’s a heckuva lot more evidence that it’s a forgery than that it is genuine, and it has to do with the electronic versions of the documents presented. Focusing on this one little tidbit is an attempt at obfuscation. For one thing, the expert was right, there was no reason to obliterate it on the fightthesmears website and you even point out that several weeks later, the number is shown on the in-the-tank media Factcheck site. Now, at that point what is a matter of faith is that Obama & team didn’t go and GET a number. And all the other evidence that the fightthesmears CoLB and the Factcheck CoLB are both forgeries is compelling, rather than a matter of faith. And that means the only evidence presented to date for his qualification has likely been a forgery, and he does not meet the standard. Any other person presenting forged evidence towards qualification would not get the job desired and would likely be facing criminal charges.
Affidavit Supporting Polarik’s Evidence in Keyes vs. Lingle
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2159775/posts
01/06/2009 11:52:38 AM PST · by Kevmo · 381 replies · 3,689+ views
Keyes vs. Lingle ^ | 12/4/2008 | Sandra Ramsey Lines