Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Exmachina
Can any one confirm this or tell me if this is a credible threat to our constitution?

I can confirm that 4 of the 32 rescinded their request for this convention. There are currently 28 states on the request list.

Stating this, the alarmist will now cite non-existing Constitutional or legislative facts that insist States can not rescind their requests.

Bottom line: Move on. There is nothing to see here.

18 posted on 12/15/2008 2:34:25 PM PST by Jeff Gordon ("An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile hoping it will eat him last." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Gordon; FreeAtlanta; mnehrling; dirtymac; DownInFlames; Don Corleone; boomop1; ...

The 16th amendment was not ratified correctly and we still live under its tirrany today.

When states vote to ratify they cannot make changes or adjustments. The 16th amendment had several states vote on alterations and send that in as their vote.

Then congress ignored that and called it ratified. Check it out.

Therefore with the courts staked so United Nations sympithizers wanting National law would allow a convention to go forward.


19 posted on 12/16/2008 4:58:49 AM PST by Exmachina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson