Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Electric Graffiti

I asked the same question some time ago. Perhaps ages ago, as part of the checks and balances system, they would have. It sounds logical to me, anyway. The response I got from my inquiry is that the SCOTUS only responds to a fraction of the cases as they make their way up from lower courts. They do not (at least not anymore) “look for business” on their own. It’s a shame ... you’d think it would be a priority to keep eyes open for crisis issues like this and head them off before the pot boils over. Still ... they are swamped in the same way as every other court in our contemporary compassionate legal system. The plate is only so big, and it is filled. I do hope, at least now that these cases have filtered up, they will but a great deal of priority on it now.


622 posted on 12/05/2008 12:50:24 PM PST by so_real
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies ]


To: so_real
"They do not (at least not anymore) “look for business” on their own. It’s a shame ... you’d think it would be a priority to keep eyes open for crisis issues like this and head them off before the pot boils over."

That is a shame....they should PRIORITIZE their decisions based on the most egregious CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER to the Constitution itself. Staggers the imagination really....
633 posted on 12/05/2008 1:01:20 PM PST by Electric Graffiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson