[solfour]

If you think there is sufficient evidence that Obama is not a viable candidate (Until the EC meets he is not Pres. elect) take it up with the current President, George Bush.

So we can get the same kind of energetic defense of the Constitution he showed when he decided to let tens of millions of illegal aliens run around the country?

snicker

[rollo tomasi]

[BP2]

If you think there is sufficient evidence that Obama is not a viable candidate (Until the EC meets he is not Pres. elect) take it up with the current President, George Bush.

We all know Bush would never get involved in Obama's legitimacy issue. We're not able to even get the GOP or McCain involved -- it wouldn't be "honorable" for them to raise such questions and doubt the words of a US Senator.

It's going to be up to us to vigilantly observe and assist, and if we see the process continue to be hijacked -- take action.

Certainly can't count on reporters to investigate this ... they're too busy sucking up to their editors to get the Obama inauguration assignment

[Cheerio]

If you think there is sufficient evidence that Obama is not a viable candidate (Until the EC meets he is not Pres. elect) take it up with the current President, George Bush. So we can get the same kind of energetic defense of the Constitution he showed when he decided to let tens of millions of illegal aliens run around the country? snicker

Couldn't be said any better. I for one would not be sitting around waiting on the Bush DOJ, or any other agency that may have jurisdiction over vetting POTUS candidates (whomever that might be seems a mystery).