Skip to comments.Is Obama the secret son of Malcolm X?
Posted on 11/02/2008 10:35:44 PM PST by Iowan
If Barack Hussein Obama II is Malcolm X's biological son, it would explain the mystery of why he was so generously helped by so many Arab and communist "friends in high places" long before he was a "somebody." Just as Malcolm X adopted Islam, his secret son would also need to learn its ways, and learn the ways of revolution, not just assume an Islamic name. He would need to be groomed and educated to organize the community called the United States of America.
by Reuven Koret, Israel Insider Publisher
In August I received a curious email. As a magazine that covers international politics, with a focus on Mideast affairs, Israel Insider gets more from its fair share of baseless tips and phony rumors. I ignore most and delete them unread. This one was a bit different. It came from a national security lawyer with extensive credentials and intelligence connections that checked out, and a phone number.
Israel Insider had been running a series of articles exploring the vagaries of Barack Obama's birth, and his concealed documentation, and this was the jumping off point of the email, which confirmed the claim that Obama was not born in Hawaii, that "Mossad are going with Mombasa" but "Proving Mombasa is not so easy, as NSIS in Nairobi are clamming up tight, as are MI6 in London, who have the original Mombasa file and full details of the birth."
(Excerpt) Read more at israelinsider.ning.com ...
You be the judge!
I did. The intonation and phrasiology are the same. Obama's voice is deeper, but I'm going to raise his key, while keeping the time and pace constant; as well as, create a likewise comparison for a deeper-sounding Malcolm X versus Obama at normal pitch, so that folks can compare the two men in different matches.
Take a look at post #63, and then tell me if it is still STOOPID.
I sure would like to see the photographs of Stanley Ann Dunham in a bikini when she was supposed to be very pregnant. I agree the article is probably way over-blown, but there also appear to be some little nuggets in it. The mention of Stanley Armour’s wartime activities may or may not carry any weight, but with communist friends in Hawaii I’m not throwing that out as pure sensationalism either.
Much of ‘Dreams’ that have to do with Hawaii has been ‘confirmed’ by an interview with Abercrombie - another one following the ayers narrative. We really don’t know much, other than what ‘they’ want us to know.
Intrigue arises from misinformation.
Too bad Larry Sinclair did not save an Obama DNA sample, we could send it to the lab to see if there is any Kenyan blood. The more I read, the more I think Obama Sr. was a patsy hired to be the husband.
>>>>I sure would like to see the photographs of Stanley Ann Dunham in a bikini when she was supposed to be very pregnant.
Fred, the information about Malcolm being in Washington came from Pam at Atlas Shrugs. I asked Pam to cite her source and she hasn’t. My questions aren’t speculations over a general article that we all read in the news. This came from Pam. BTW, one of the sources that came back was an article someone wrote about meeting Malcolm X at the World’s Fair in ‘61. The World’s Fair in Washington didn’t open until ‘62.
If the source of information can be verified as to Malcolm being in Washington in ‘60/’61, great. Why won’t Pam say where she got that?
explains a lot doesn't it, why no one ever saw them together, why they did not share a common address, why no one saw her pregnant in Hawaii, why obama snr took off when he did without caring about his so-called offspring, and the only photograph of the 'father' and the boy together is around 1971 at an airport in Hawaii when obama snr came for a visit...not to see the boy in fact, but to attend a reunion with his friends, one of whom was Abercrombie who visited obama snr in Kenya...
'Dreams' is unravelling as we 'speak'
I have no doubt at all that “neighbor” Willy Ayers is the ghostwriter of that drivel as well.
bothers me too...but I'm an aussie and don't have a map of the US in my head. Why would it be so important that X be in Washington then? For example, Stanley Ann was accepted by the U of Chicago. Doesn't that mean she may have been in Chicago herself? Would she apply to go to the U of Chicago without some connections there?
Looks mighty close to me...
Perhaps he might have been there on a personal visit, to maybe visit other Nation of Islam members that he knew. Something that might not have been documented as Nation of Islam business....
Just a thought
“The evidence strongly suggests that Ayers transformed Obama from the struggling literalist of 1994 into the sophisticated postmodernist of 1995, and he did so not by tutoring, but by rewriting, including the very Introduction and Preface.”
He’s secret son of a something, all right. And the secret is getting out...
However, in the same vein, Here's a link from today that quotes Grammie's brother from his Chicago home.
"I think she thinks she was important in raising a fine young man," Charles Payne, 83, said in a brief telephone interview from his Chicago home. "I doubt if it would occur to her that he would go this far this fast. But she's enjoyed watching it."
>>>Why would it be so important that X be in Washington then?
I don’t know. That is what Pam posted. Malcolm X is a very, very documented person. I read several university sites that track his speeches and a few of his bios. I put him in several places during the time frame Pam drew. Pam put him in Washington and I want to know the cite for it.
>>>For example, Stanley Ann was accepted by the U of Chicago. Doesn’t that mean she may have been in Chicago herself?
::shrugs:: Pam made the map, not me. I’m not discounting the possibility that she met him. But we have to put them together before we can make Malcolm Obama’s father.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.