Posted on 09/18/2008 2:55:02 PM PDT by NoLibZone
Any word on the Obama flub. He called AIG the American Insurance Group. Nah, didn’t think so. Fox News doesn’t mention the thugs getting in you face crap either.
The SEC has some role here, as it had oversight over Bear Stearns and Lehman, but to me the far bigger culprits are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which have a different regulator, who, IMHO, is not nearly as responsible for this mess as Congress, the Democrats and Barney Frank.
Dang, I just knew there was a reason for that rant...
My guess is that the Obama camp sent them the (false) information and the FIVE MORONS did not even do a simple fact check before squatting out this pile of dung.
Bush couldn’t have fired the HUD director then.
The Chairman of the Fed is in office for so many years and if his time is up, the President can dump him and nominate someone else. He is not there forever. That is why it was so dumb when Greenspan’s time was up that Bush renewed him for another term.
“Cox should voluntarily step down just because all this crap happened on his watch. He failed.”
It wasn’t just Cox or short selling though. It’s the whole approach to mortage guarantee, lack of oversight from all regulatory bodies, including the Federal Reserve, and all the political corrution that resulted from it. The whole idea behind Fanny and Freddie was to protect banks, and they have never, even for one minute had the best interest of we the people at heart. We get laid off and have trouble making payments, who cares? As long as Mr. Banker gets his money back everything is just peachy while we’re loading up storage facilities looking for a place to live. I think it’s the assumption that we’re all just potential deadbeats that really gets me in a miff.
What has really set me off tonight is that Sec. Paulson wants to create a separate Federal agency to assume bad mortage debt. Again, protecting banks, and ‘officially’ socializing risk and poor judgement with other people’s money by financial institutions. It’s an automatic taxpayer bailout from now into the future that fixes absolutely nothing for average people while encouraging the same kind of risk and corruption that got us into this mess. It’s so ridiculous, and absurd. And we will still hear whining by bank CEOs who make $500M over 3 years that they lost 50 of it when their company’s stock tanked due to liquidity problems. Geez, cry me a river.
This stuff has to end and to do that the government needs to stop focusing on fat cat bank bailouts and start working for you and me. Scrap Fanny and Freddie and make a system that focuses on the individual, not bankers.
Just when I was starting to get on the McCain wagon ...., a dose of reality.
Win or lose, McCain is a jackass.
The commission consists of five members who are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. The terms of the commissioners are staggered and the basic length of each term is five years. No more than three of the commissioners may be members of the same political party. The statute does not provide for a chairman. Until 1950, the Chairman was elected annually. Following Reorganization Plan No. 10 of 1950 (see, Reorganization Act of 1949, 5 U.S.C. Secs. 901-913), the President designates the chairman. Pursuant to this Reorganization Plan, the chairman succeeded to most of the executive and administrative functions of the commission. The Act does not expressly give to the President the power to remove a commissioner. However, for the purposes of this case, we accept appellants’ assertions in their brief, that it is commonly understood that the President may remove a commissioner only for “inefficiency, neglect of duty or malfeasance in office.” While the SEC must transmit evidence of criminal misconduct to the Attorney General, there can be no doubt the SEC is authorized to institute civil actions in the federal district courts to enforce various security laws.
22
Several conclusions can be drawn from this brief overview. First, as the President has the power to choose the chairman of the SEC from its commissioners to serve an indefinite term, it follows that the chairman serves at the pleasure of the President.
http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/855/855.F2d.677.86-2319.html
The bottom line is the President can fire the Chairman of the FEC but he can also remove any of the members for cause. Probably wouldn’t be smart but it can happen.
Let’s say the president really, really hates the Fed chairman. Can he fire him?
The president does have the power to remove a member of the Board of Governors, but only for cause. Cause in this case would mean something like the chairman got the keys to the vault and was found stuffing his pockets with bullion.
“I don’t think Obama could actually put lipstick on a pig, either.”
Oh, I though he was the lipstick on the same old tax and spend, liberal approach to public policy, big government pig.
McCain is correct.
Cox has done a really terrible job at the SEC.
You’ve got it about right the way I see it... it is kind of moot as to whether Cox can be fired solely by the President. I’ll bet he doesn’t survive the year in any event given the search for witches and ogres that will be initiated by congress and every politician and investor in the US.
The obvious spirit of the remark was this: someone wasn't doing his job, and it would be best if the post were held by another person.
If he becomes president, I am sure he will, so what’s the problem?
Asked how McCain would fire Cox if the president does not have the formal power to fire the chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the McCain campaign pointed to former SEC Chairman Harvey Pitt who resigned in 2002 when it was made clear to him that he had lost the confidence of the Bush administration. "Not only is there historical precedent for SEC Chairs to be removed, the President of the United States always reserves the right to request the resignation of an appointee and maintain the customary expectation that it will be delivered," said McCain spokesperson Tucker Bounds.
McCain was correct. Why did SEC allow all these unfathomable derivative instruments?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.