It's not a stretch at all. It's a stretch to call someone who doesn't believe that our most fundamental God-given right, the right to life, belongs to all, "pro-life."
Does anyone even remember what the word "unalienable" even means any more? Have your brains turned to mush?
John McCain and Sarah Palin are no more pro-life than Stephen A. Douglas was anti-slavery.
Geeze!
Are some of you so single issue and narrow that you can’t see the risks of the alternatives? In all purity, the right to life will not exist in a Marxist society!
You can define and parse all you want - and be beautifully religiously pure - but you are pissing in the wind if you think the ideology alone should dominate the entire discussion. If you don’t have a supportive party, you don’t have a secular platform. And the best chance for support of your position is McCain/Palin. The alternatives basically suck.
“It’s not a stretch at all. It’s a stretch to call someone who doesn’t believe that our most fundamental God-given right, the right to life, belongs to all, “pro-life.”
Does anyone even remember what the word “unalienable” even means any more? Have your brains turned to mush?
John McCain and Sarah Palin are no more pro-life than Stephen A. Douglas was anti-slavery.”
Sarah Palin walked the walk, by having a child with Down Syndrome, and she said that we should not create an embryo only to destroy it.
You’re fighting for Alan Keyes with a broken sword, and you can’t win a fight with that broken sword.
Keyes is a fine man, but like all human beings is not perfect. He believes in reparations for some Blacks.