You deceit-filled poseur: “I wonder if even one child has survived to date as a result of the passage of this law?” Well, by stopping the particular method for killing alive unborn children via forced premature labor and abandonment to die struggling to try and breathe, the answer to your demonic ploy is that untold millions of children will not be miurdered by the abortion method you’re seeking to obfuscate. Get thee behind us, Satan
On 2000-JUL-20, the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League (NARAL) issued a press release criticizing H.R. 4292. They asserted that extending legal personhood to premature infants who are born alive after surviving abortions constitutes an "assault" on Roe v. Wade. By providing legal rights to born-alive infants "at any stage of development," including those who had achieved viability, the supporters of H.R. 4292 are "directly contradicting one of Roe's basic tenets."
Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D-OH), testified before the Subcommittee that providing legal personhood to premature infants who survive abortions "is an attempt to do what the U.S. Supreme Court has strictly forbidden over and over--it unduly restricts a woman's right to terminate a pregnancy."
Number one, these are purposeful arguments aimed at mischaracterizing what the bill was intended to do. Number two, the pleadings are factually efforts to protect killing born children by neglect so they die from conditions medical assistance could alleviate. Evil relies on explanations to be more complex than the lie evil can spin in a sound byte. We have two examples of agitprops doing just that at FR in this thread!