Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney
Few cities can claim their river caught fire.

I bet that was a sight!..............cue up Smoke on The Water by Deep Purple................

33 posted on 09/04/2008 10:49:01 AM PDT by Red Badger (If you're not part of the solution, then you must be part of the government............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Red Badger

This was not the first time that the river had caught on fire. Fires occurred on the Cuyahoga River in 1868, 1883, 1887, 1912, 1922, 1936, 1941, 1948, and in 1952. The 1952 fire caused over 1.5 million dollars in damage.

On August 1, 1969, Time magazine reported on the fire and on the condition of the Cuyahoga River. The magazine stated:

Some River! Chocolate-brown, oily, bubbling with subsurface gases, it oozes rather than flows. “Anyone who falls into the Cuyahoga does not drown,” Cleveland’s citizens joke grimly. “He decays”. . . The Federal Water Pollution Control Administration dryly notes: “The lower Cuyahoga has no visible signs of life, not even low forms such as leeches and sludge worms that usually thrive on wastes.” It is also — literally — a fire hazard.

http://www.ohiohistorycentral.org/entry.php?rec=1642


41 posted on 09/04/2008 11:18:06 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson