What are you claiming TechDude lied about?
What non-existent evidence did he fabricate?
Why do you say TechDude was a fraud?
First of all, I never trusted TechDude from the start and was suspicious of some of his claims, including the Hollywood-like "dead rabbit" in the mailbox trick, but I kept my thoughts to myself because Texas Darling and I are friends, and I did not wish to embarrass a friend who had trusted TechDude.
I did, however, tell Texas Darling not to trust him.
Now that the Israel Insider gave TechDude the boot for not doing what he promised he would do, it was now time for me to tell what I know.
TechDude's research was a house of cards build upon his claim of receiving several image and paper COLB's from the years 2001 to 2003, and 2006 to 2008. When I saw his 2001-03 collection, I recognized them right off the bat as rehashes of the only existing COLBs on the Internet, such as those belonging to PD, Tomoyasu, and Smith.
This is also the reason why Techdude did not present any COLBs from 2004 & 2005 -- because none existed online.
TechDude went on to say that 2006 and 2007 COLBs had borders that were identical to Michele's 2008 border. TechDude figured that nobody had ever seen what a real 2006 and 2007 COLB looked like, and his claim would go unchallenged.
He was dead wrong.
I received two real 2007 COLB images, and not only did they NOT have the same border as 2008 COLBS, they also bore a striking resemblance to the border on the 2007 Obama COLB image.
If ever there was a "smoking gun" to his deceit, this was it.
I should also like to add that I tried using his methodology (and mine) to look for any traces of Maya Soetoro, but found nothing -- which was as expected because I had already postulated six weeks ago that the existing text has been covered up with pieces of the background, thereby obliterating any of the previous text.
He also stole ideas from me when he went public on Atlas Shruggs with his "Exclusive." That upper-left border comparison was in an image I sent to him.
It sucked to sit on the sidelines while TechDude was sgetting all the accolades, and it also sucks now, because since the arguments raised against his research are now validated, it casts a pall on mine -- even though I stand behind everything I've done, and have never resorted to any tomfoolery to prove a point.
My critics will disagree, but only because they cannot refute them.