[metmom]

Again, you have it completely backwards. You will always have to reject God's creation whenever you think it contradicts Darwin's fairytale.

Interesting that when there's a conflict between current accepted scientific consensus and the Word of God, that the Bible is wrong as a default option? There's never any consideration that science might be wrong, as it so often is shown to be.

It's pretty amusing coming from a group of people who claim that what they're all about is not concerned with truth.

[GodGunsGuts]

==Interesting that when there’s a conflict between current accepted scientific consensus and the Word of God, that the Bible is wrong as a default option?

Sadly, your description also includes the “Christian” Darwinists. Or should I say, Darwinist Christians?

[Ha Ha Thats Very Logical]

Interesting that when there's a conflict between current accepted scientific consensus and the Word of God, that the Bible is wrong as a default option?

A conflict between science and the Bible doesn't make the Bible wrong, it just makes it not a science book.