Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shermy
“There’s always going to be a spore on a grassy knoll.”

Yeah, well, dead microbiologists tell no tales.

247 posted on 08/19/2008 11:17:51 AM PDT by jpl ("First come smiles, then lies. Last is gunfire." - Roland of Gilead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]


http://www.fredericknewspost.com/sections/news/display.htm?storyID=78992

Scientists: FBI destroyed Ivins’ matching anthrax sample
Originally published August 19, 2008

By Justin M. Palk
News-Post Staff

WASHINGTON — Contrary to initial reports, Bruce Ivins did give investigators a sample of the anthrax the FBI has identified as the same type used in the attacks, but they destroyed it because it didn’t meet their standards for evidence.

FBI scientists released that information Monday in a briefing at FBI headquarters, where researchers who assisted in the investigation discussed the scientific process they used to track the anthrax used in the 2001 mailings back to Fort Detrick and Ivins.

...Ivins submitted two sets of samples to the FBI. The first, sent in February 2002, did not meet the standards the FBI had set for a library of samples it was building, said Vahid Majidi, assistant director of the FBI’s Weapons of Mass Destruction Directorate. The FBI destroyed that sample and Ivins submitted another set in April 2002.

Ivins’ first sample would have been scientifically valid but difficult to use as evidence in court because it was gathered in a different manner than the other samples in the library, said an FBI scientist who refused to identify himself at the briefing.

...In 2006, investigators went to Dr. Paul Keim, a Northern Arizona University biology professor who had been helping them identify the anthrax, and Keim gave them duplicates of all the anthrax samples, the unnamed FBI scientist said. Keim had kept his copy of Ivins’ February 2002 sample, and testing identified it as RMR-1029.

Chris Hassell, head of the FBI laboratory, said he couldn’t explain why Ivins would submit one sample of anthrax matching RMR-1029, then later submit a sample that did not match.

...Out of 1,070 samples gathered, eight matched the powder used in the mailings, Majidi said. All of them were from RMR-1029 or its descendant.

More than 100 people at two labs — USAMRIID and a lab officials refused to identify — had access to RMR-1029, Majidi said. Officials did not explain how they eliminated those other people from their investigation.


248 posted on 08/19/2008 11:42:30 AM PDT by Shermy (Barry O'Java - Jon Carry '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson