Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Physicist Claims First Real Demonstration of Cold Fusion
www.physorg.com ^ | 05/27/2008 | Staff

Posted on 05/27/2008 1:35:26 PM PDT by Red Badger

On May 22, researchers at Osaka University presented the first demonstration of cold fusion since an unsuccessful attempt in 1989 that has clouded the field to this day.

To many people, cold fusion sounds too good to be true. The idea is that, by creating nuclear fusion at room temperature, researchers can generate a nearly unlimited source of power that uses water as fuel and produces almost zero waste. Essentially, cold fusion would make oil obsolete.

However, many experts debate whether money should be spent on cold fusion research or applied to more realistic alternative energy solutions. For decades, researchers around the world have been simply trying to show that cold fusion is indeed possible, but they´ve yet to take that important first step.

Now, esteemed Physics Professor Yoshiaki Arata of Osaka University in Japan claims to have made the first successful demonstration of cold fusion. Last Thursday, May 22, Arata and his colleague Yue-Chang Zhang of Shianghai Jiotong University presented the cold fusion demonstration to 60 onlookers, including other physicists, as well as reporters from six major newspapers and two TV studios. If Arata and Zhang´s demonstration is real, it could lead to a future of new, clean, and cheap energy generation.

In their experiment, the physicists forced deuterium gas into a cell containing a mixture of palladium and zirconium oxide, which absorbed the deuterium to produce a dense "pynco" deuterium. In this dense state, the deuterium nuclei from different atoms were so close together that they fused to produce helium nuclei.

Evidence for the occurrence of this fusion came from measuring the temperature inside the cell. When Arata first injected the deuterium gas, the temperature rose to about 70° C (158° F), which Arata explained was due to nuclear and chemical reactions. When he turned the gas off, the temperature inside the cell remained warmer than the cell wall for 50 hours, which Arata said was an effect of nuclear fusion.

While Arata´s demonstration looked promising to his audience, the real test is still to come: duplication. Many scientists and others are now recalling the infamous 1989 demonstration by Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons, who claimed to produce controlled nuclear fusion in a glass jar at room temperature. However, no one - including Fleischmann and Pons - could duplicate the experiment, leading many people to consider cold fusion a pseudoscience to this day.

But one witness at the recent demonstration, physicist Akito Takahashi of Osaka University, thought that the experiment should be able to be repeated.

"Arata and Zhang demonstrated very successfully the generation of continuous excess energy [heat] from ZrO2-nano-Pd sample powders under D2 gas charging and generation of helium-4," Takahashi told New Energy Times. "The demonstrated live data looked just like data they reported in their published papers [J. High Temp. Soc. Jpn, Feb. and March issues, 2008]. This demonstration showed that the method is highly reproducible."

In addition, researchers will have to repeat the experiment with larger amounts of the palladium and zirconium oxide mixture in order to generate larger quantities of energy.

via: Physics World and New Energy Times


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Japan; Technical
KEYWORDS: coldfusion; energy; lenr; nuclear; radiation; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-165 last
To: grey_whiskers

Couldn’t say for sure without researching it in more detail. I agree that he had known more about it than me. On the other hand, there are currently a number of physicists that know more about it than he knew, especially ones that specialize in atoms embedded in metallic lattices. So far, they have seemed rather doubtful.

Schwinger’s contributions to phyiscs are considerable, but they are for doing QED mathematics in a vacuum. Adding an atomic lattice to the mix really complicates things. If anyone really knew what was going on in atomic lattices, we’d have room temperature superconductivity by now, or at least know that it was not possible.


161 posted on 06/01/2008 1:52:50 AM PDT by Netheron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Netheron
Schwinger’s contributions to phyiscs are considerable, but they are for doing QED mathematics in a vacuum.

Yes, but the top physicists (e.g. Landau, Feynmann, you name it) seem to get their fingers into a little bit of everything.

What struck me is that he came up with a putative explanation for the lack of gamma-ray emissions, and a place for the excess heat "to be put":

At very low energies of relative motion, the proton and deuteron of the HD reaction are in an s-state, one of zero orbital angular momentum, and therefore of positive orbital parity. The intrinsic parities of proton, deuteron, and 3He are also positive. Then, the usually dominant electric dipole radiation—which requires a parity change—is forbidden...one must look for something that is characteristic of cold fusion, something that does not exist in the plasma regime of hot fusion. The obvious answer is the lattice in which the deuterium is confined.

Adding an atomic lattice to the mix really complicates things. If anyone really knew what was going on in atomic lattices, we’d have room temperature superconductivity by now, or at least know that it was not possible.

Agreed -- and it is also worthwhile at this juncture to point out that computational resources were *much* (orders of magnitude) less capable, thus compounding the problem. This may have been an *additional* reason people were unwilling to consider his suggestions.

Cheers!

162 posted on 06/01/2008 6:15:55 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: All

Intrade opened up a contract on the replication of Dr. Arata’s experiment.

Dr Yoshiaki Arata’s Cold Fusion Experiment

Dr Arata’s experiment to be replicated in peer-reviewed scientific journal on/before 31 Dec 2008
M Trade - 9.0 - 0 0

http://www.intrade.com/jsp/intrade/common/c_cd.jsp?conDetailID=615448&z=1213211487203


163 posted on 06/11/2008 12:17:47 PM PDT by Kevmo (SURFRINAGWIASS : Shut Up RINOs. Free Republic is not a GOP Website. It's a SOCON Site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
The peer review process alone would probably take longer than that.

If all the data for the experiment had been collected (which it probably hasn't,) and he started writing the paper right now, he would probably submit the paper by the middle of July. Peer review process would take place, requesting revisions. Especially with a project this controversial. If the paper were accepted in October, it might still not make the December issue.

So a peer reviewed paper being published before December is exceptionally unlikely unless all of the steps above have been initiated already.
164 posted on 06/11/2008 12:26:46 PM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

Thanks for the heads up on the process.


165 posted on 06/13/2008 5:32:34 PM PDT by Kevmo (SURFRINAGWIASS : Shut Up RINOs. Free Republic is not a GOP Website. It's a SOCON Site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-165 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson