Opponent calls ruling “worst kind of judicial activism”
..yep..
Violating the sepration of powers they are trusted with is grounds alone to be booted.
...the majoritys approach has removed the sensitive issues surrounding same-sex marriage from their proper forum the arena of legislative resolution and risks opening the door to similar treatment of other, less deserving, claims of a right to marry. By thus moving the policy debate from the legislative process to the court, the majority engages in faulty constitutional analysis and violates the separation of powers. - dissenting opinion