[OPS4]

She should be served at the start of the next debate on National Television.

[Ouderkirk]

Ooooh that would be sweet...but never happen.

Would be nice if she was questioned about it though.

[Old Retired Army Guy]

She has Secret Service Protection as the former first lady and candidate. The Process Server wouldn’t be able to get within 30 feet of her.

[Virginia Ridgerunner]

This should be fun to watch when the process servers repeatedly encounter her Secret Service detail.

[Steely Tom]

Yuh. I’m holding my breath till this actually happens.

[reefdiver]

Lets just see if this story has any leg’s. She just keeps on giving

[kittymyrib]

With the load of dirty campaign money that was not sucessfully laundered in both Hillary and Barry’s past political dealings, the NYT finds McCain’s “possible” favoritism toward a lobbyist’s company the fodder for a front page article.
When are we going to see similar stories on Paul and Hillary, or Barry and Rezko? You don’t have to rely on innuendo and phantom sources in either of those cases. Where’s the beef, NYT?

[GQuagmire]

ping

[johnny7]

The media won’t even report it... why would they allow it to be served on one of their broadcasts?!

[apocalypto]

I would love to see that.

[AD from SpringBay]

Can you imagine the headlines if this were ANYBODY else in the nation? Little old you or I would probably be behind bars at this point awaiting extradition to California.

[reagan_fanatic]

And the media yawned...

[G Larry]

Hey!
Maybe you could pass this on to the New York Times?

I’m sure they’d do a front page story on this!

[stayathomemom]

Maybe Rick Lazio can do it.

[doug from upland]

Where is the next debate or campaign stop in Texas?

[knarf]

Rule 4 seems to be the basic understanding of process serving ... I'll continue looking

Realizing, of course, the x42's are flagrant deniers of the law.

[moonman]

"She should be served at the start of the next debate on National Television"

Get the cops from 'Law & Order' to serve the subpoena or to make the arrest. They always do it in very public places to embarrass the hell out of them.

[laweeks]

Why, hell, if they wouldn’t indict her for murder, tampering with evidence, illegal cattle futures trading, grand theft, witness tampering, perjury, suborning of perjury, slander, and obstruction of justice, why would she worry about being subpoenaed for a crummy little court appearance . . . Sir Madam Shrillery, Her Royal Thighness, just doesn’t want to go to court . . . so, there! I mean, c’mon!

[street_lawyer]

If she is a party to a civil action than she has been served with the complaint and summons and is subject to the jurisdiction of the court and may only needs a notice to appear served on her attorney?

[doug from upland]

[BenLurkin]

Hillary Clinton’s attorney declared that none of Hillary Clinton’s lawyers would accept a deposition subpoena on Hillary’s behalf.

I take it she isn't a party to the litigation.