Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wideawake

Is that story number 16 or number 17 that NATO told about why we bombed the Embassy. I thought it was the bad maps, or, oh wait, perhaps a mistake by the CIA’s poorly trained staff that couldn’t be stopped in time. So, if China’s embassy was supporting the Serbs how is that any different from U.S. who are sopporting the Albanian Rebels in Kosovo against the legitemite Serbian Government.


724 posted on 02/21/2008 5:04:46 PM PST by dschapin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 722 | View Replies ]


To: dschapin
Is that story number 16 or number 17 that NATO told about why we bombed the Embassy.

NATO is under no obligation to share what it knows with the press.

how is that any different from U.S. who are sopporting the Albanian Rebels in Kosovo against the legitemite Serbian Government

It's different in two ways.

Firstly, the US was not breaking international law by using its embassy as a military asset against Serbia.

Second, the US recognition of the new nation of Kosovo is not a military action, but a diplomatic one.

Understand?

741 posted on 02/21/2008 6:04:09 PM PST by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 724 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson