Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: manapua; Antoninus; DoughtyOne; JRochelle; Petronski; Cicero

Here’s where it all hits bottom:

Levin’s right. Mitt Romney IS more Conservative than McCain.

If Romney had been the Senator from Arizona these last many years we wouldn’t have:
Romney-Feingold
Romney-Kennedy
Romney-Leiberman
...

Mitt Romeny would not have been a “Gang of 14” instigator, nor even a participant.

Mitt Romney would not have opposed President Bush’s tax cuts.

On the core issue of our times, I believe that Mitt Romney will stay the course in Iraq, and hold firm in our global march against terrorists, and terrorist organizations.

Further, I’ll go out on a limb and assert that Mitt Romney will prove to be a better friend to Israel than G. W. Bush has been.

Is Romney perfect? HA! No, nobody is, but McCain is WORSE! WAY worse.

Romeny can at least openly discuss how his thinking has changed on issues. Romney can comfortably admit that he’s been wrong in the past.

McCain, when asked point-blank about past mistakes, can’t even begin to get his mouth to form the words. He hems and haws, stutters, stammers, and does pirouettes all the way around Robin Hood’s barn before petering out in a stinking bog of evasion and mealy-mouthed equivocation.

Tell me honestly, do you REALLY want that in a President??

I came from the far right end of the Conservative bench, and I was rooting for someone more pincipled than Romeny. None of those guys are left, but, of the three credible candidates that remain, Romney is THE MOST conservative, the most mentally stable, the most genuine as a person — he’s not 100% in any area, but hes at least 80% across the board. He’s got negatives in his past, but they’re not the egregious, national, Constitution-subsuming negatives that MCCain has “blessed” us with.

I also think there’s a great deal of credibility to the argument that the MSM likes McCain because he’s NOT conservative, and they understand that if he wins the GOP nomination, he’ll be cannon fodder. Heck, he and Hillary are such buds up in the Senate, that if they’re both nominated by the respective parties, this could turn into the most lovey-dovey Presidential campaign in U.S. History. And, BOY would the country be UNITED, again. All of the alphabet orgs on the left could just take the whole election cycle off, because it wouldn’t matter all that much to them who won. All the usual divisiveness would be gone from the campaign... The whole thing would play out like a college bowl game, except that the last play will feature McCain and Hillary in a Shakespearean “et tu, Brute” moment, and we’ll be inaugurating Hillary on 1-20-09.

THAT is what you will get if McCain becomes the GOP nominee.


245 posted on 01/31/2008 12:23:30 PM PST by HKMk23 (AUT VINCERI AUT MORI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: HKMk23

I think some of you are operating under a false assumption.

I do not support John McCain because he is basically a democrat.

I do not support Romney for the same reason.

Add Giuliani, Huckabee, and even Paul in there on some issues.

I agree with most of your comments. Is Romney better than McCain? I believe so in some ways. I’m remain unconvinced in others.


249 posted on 01/31/2008 12:26:53 PM PST by DoughtyOne (PARTY WANTED: Full Time, Cons exp a must. Refs 20 yrs. No Amnesty sptrs. 1 vote per 4 yrs negotiable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]

To: HKMk23
Mitt Romney


275 posted on 01/31/2008 12:43:20 PM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson