Not at all just pointing out Mitt does not know who is and is not in the middle class. Im not saying being in any class gives entitlement.
Hillary and her “middle class” being defined
Ok so your point is Willard not as bad as Hillary... Well neither is Huck, McCain, or (quite honestly) Trudy whats your point?
Romney says when HE talks about everage americans, he’s talking about everybody making up to $200,000.
No it means when he targets economic packages (tax cuts, rebates, deductions, ....) at the middle class he is thinking 150-500K a year..
Liberals might balk at his defense of people all the way from 0 to 200,000 of income, but conservatives and frankly general country club republicans will like that, as will smart independents who know that the democrats are looking to screw everybody over.
Again its not about who deserves/should get/should be punished, its about the fact Willard is out of touch..
That was not my point. My point was that your argument was more in tune with what Hillary would say than what conservatives believe.
It appears to be you that has no idea who is in the middle class. If $200,000 isn't middle class, then what is it? You have to have $250,000 per year to qualify to buy an average house in coastal regions of California; do you think there is no middle class here? What about Massachusets, Connecticut, Vermont, or the Adirondak region of New York? You have strange ideas.