Is it me, or does the lady on the right look like she's still in shock?
Posted on 01/19/2008 5:44:02 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner
No evidence of bird strikes anywhere on the aircraft. Nose, wing leading edges, engine inlets ...
Is it me, or does the lady on the right look like she's still in shock?
Ping.
Your opinion is at least 100 percent wrong.600 feet above the ground is about 2 miles from the end of the runway. Jet transport A/C on approach are configured with a lot of drag (gear/flaps) and require almost 75 to 80 percent power just to stabilize on the glide path. A sudden loss of power to both engines, for example from an autothrottle computer failure or sudden stoppage due to fuel contamination would result in a rapid decrease in airspeed and altitude beyond any pilots control. (gravity you know)Large aircraft do not glide in to land as do their smaller brothers and sisters.
If it had been a strike, the evidence of the strike would have already been found. However, no turbine engine is proof against a bird strike. A big enough bird - or enough birds - will kill a motor. Look what the geese did to the AWACS up in Alaska several years back.
No, I'm quite sure it's Carol Burnett. I'd been wondering what she was doing lately.
This fellow really needs to change his last name. I don't think I'm the only one who'd have a hard time stifling laughter if he was introduced to me by name and I knew who he was.
She has a bit of that Camilla Parker Bowes look to her...
Ron Howard, alongside wazzitzname (George Clooney’s ‘Rat uncle who ran for congress), and Camilla...
OK. So left to right, it’s Ron Howard, Jay Leno, and Carol Burnett. Got it!
}:-)4
The official report is here.
Clearly form the photo’s, there was dirt in the engine. Yep, too much dirt in the engine will stop em every time. ;^)
This was clearly Bush’s fault..
Women, children and minorities hardest hit..
they were good but how about the pilots of Air Transat Flight 236..... I didn’t know they made gliders also...hahahahaha
Good grief...who wouldn’t be still in shock??
Your views may be prescient. They are shared by some members of British Airways Engineering staff at Heathrow who cannot understand why icing in the fuel tank would block both engine feeds just 40 minutes from touchdown after 13 hours flying over the Arctic.
Scuttlebut in the hangar is that the co-pilot was doing one of the rare but obligatory on an occasional basis manual landings at Heathrow which has automatic landing systems for all BA aircraft.
The captain who has since left the airline may not have been in the cockpit according to hangar scuttlebut and the co-pilot may have come in too low and then found that the fuel thrust response has a time delay.
As of now these are just private opinions to be confirmed or denied by the Accident Investigations Board.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.