How is it that some people who claim to put diversity and tolerance at the head of their social priorities are not satisfied unless every great author and scholar are provided a “sexual orientation” identity, as some mystic clue to their writing, while, hypocritically, the entire base of promoting “diversity and tolerance” is the “universal” nature of so many “social” themes, such as love and romance, regardless of “sexual orientation”. Their need to supply a sexual orientation identity to the authors of great works says that they do not actually believe the themes they claim to be universal are universal. Hypocrites.
There is no way that you can call Shakespeare’s writing “Fairy Tales!”