Riight, because being for limited government, pro-free market, cutting taxes and spending, pro-life, strongly pro2A, pro-sovereignty, sticking to the constitution, is SO "liberal." 
Meanwhile, we have a pro-abortion, gun-grabbing, pro-gay, open borders, cross-dressing adulterer as a *front-runner* in the party that's supposed to be conservative.
I would say more about the utter absurdity of that, but I don't want to get banned, so I'll let the readers decide just how much sense that makes.
“Riight[sic], because being for limited government, pro-free market, cutting taxes and spending, pro-life, strongly pro2A, pro-sovereignty, sticking to the constitution, is SO “liberal.”
ROTFLOL!! Are you kidding .. and just how long will we be “sovereign” if the borders remain open and WE NEVER ANSWER ANY ATTACK UPON OUR COUNTRY.
Ron Paul is so dangerous .. it’s frightening. And anyone who threatens to go 3rd party with the possibility of giving the country HILLARY CLINTON is not only stupid - they’re arrogant and don’t give a damn about America.
I wouldn’t expect a response from him, and if you do get one, don’t expect it to be anything but name calling.