“I don’t think you’ll find Ron Paul disagreeing with our use of force against the Barbary Pirates or against the Taliban. Since you’ve cheapened the level of discourse with your “pet retard” remarks I doubt you have the mental and emoitonal stability to rationally address the issues in the first place.”
Oh like YOU address the issues? ROFLMAO....Wow you’re funnier than david letterman.
“I am not a decided Ron Paul supporter”
Pardon me while I put my hip boots on.
“but I would rather not have his record or ideas misrepresented by people who are overly emotional and ignorant.”
As opposed to the lying and ignorant who support him?
His record is quite CLEAR, and it CONTRADICTS the whitewashed BS that he’s spoon feeding to people like you.
Time and time again he has voted AGAINST putting troops on the border even though he says that “We must do whatever it takes to control entry into our country”
He says whatever it takes, yet he’s against troops on the border. In other words he lied since it’s obvious that he’s not willing to do “whatever it takes”.
Please state, based upon Ron Paul’s own words, his reason for not supporting the stationing US Armed Forces on our borders. So far you’ve merely indulged verbal bloviation, misstating Dr. Paul’s position and his reason for the same. Unless you can do this, one can only hope the hip boots have some effect in arresting your jerk knee.
Meanwhile I agree with you, that on the face of it, to say one will do “whatever it takes” while taking troops off the table is self-contradictory. I think the point is debatable; that troops on the border would be an effective means of curbing illegal border crossing. I would not consider it the only means.