Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron PaulPots' MoveOn/GeorgeSoros Support!
TownHall.com ^ | 12.20.2007 | Kevin McCullough

Posted on 12/19/2007 9:36:41 PM PST by jodiluvshoes

Desperate to take support from wherever he can get it.

Some - well more like all of two readers have gotten a little cross-eyed over the fact that I dared to imply that George Soros/MoveOn forces were working covertly to assist the most Soros-like candidate on the GOP ticket.

The truth is some of the support has been covert, some of it rather obvious...

For instance one MoveOn group assisted in the funding and production of this television ad:

(Excerpt) Read more at kevinmccullough.townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2008; 911truth; clinton2008; clintonistas; commieron; donors; elections; endorsedbydu; fundedbysoros; georgesoros; gwot; kevinmccullough; moveon; moveondotorg; moveonorg; nutjob; paulestinians; ronpaul; soros; splitthevote; supportedbysoros; thedailykoscandidate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 341-350 next last
To: Fester Chugabrew

“”Paul voted to give the president the authority to use military force against bin Laden’s group in Afghanistan “

And his plan to ‘wipe out’ Bin Laden’s group in Iraq is?


181 posted on 12/20/2007 3:36:09 PM PST by death2tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

“You mean like those who still fall for the “WMD in Iraq, Saddam will attack us with his anthrax-laden paper airplanes of death” crowd? Even when the Bush administration itself denies there were WMD in Iraq?”

There were WMD in Iraq. Saddam used them against the Kurds and the Iranians.

“Or maybe those “paranoids” who want to attack and possibly nuke Iran despite our intel agencies unanimously telling us that there is no current Iranian nuke program?”

So exactly why does Iran continue to enrich uranium?


182 posted on 12/20/2007 3:37:46 PM PST by DugwayDuke (Ron Paul - building a bridge to the 19th century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

A check into history may reveal that we did not intially enter the middle east by force because they were “raising rattlesnakes.” OTOH, if another country came over here to establish their way of government in place of ours, and we attacked their interests in response, would you say they are right in attacking us further since we are, by their terms, “rattlesnakes?”

I hate the notion of blame America first as much as the next guy, but we cannot afford to be so ignorant as to pursue foreign policy without regard to consequences. Our neighbors internationally indulge practices wholly alien to ours. They may even do things that are self-destructive and inimical to individual freedoms. I have personal neighbors whose lives would be improved if I went into their home and ran it for a while. Do you think they would welcome the offer? Would it make sense to force my way in when they say, “No thank you” from the get go.

There is no question other countries have invited us to do business, but business done at the point of the gun? That’s not business. That’s extortion.


183 posted on 12/20/2007 3:57:09 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: lormand
You didn't read about his submarine comment . . .

I saw a comment in passing, alleging in so many words that he believes a single nuclear submarine would be sufficient as a means of protecting our country. But I haven't seen the source. I certainly would not trust you to provide either a credible source or assessment in this matter.

184 posted on 12/20/2007 4:08:59 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: death2tyrants
And his plan to ‘wipe out’ Bin Laden’s group in Iraq is?

Draft you and send you over there to fulfill your screen name.

More seriously, we ought to recognize that Bin Laden and Al Qaeda, while still a threat, have already been minimized through some pointed aggression in their direction. I suspect Ron Paul would facilitate efforts to learn about and attack specific enemies before they become an issue, but to pull back our footprint when it comes to establishing a way of life like ours amidst people who simply don't care about it.

The idea of strengthening conservative principles and practices in our own land, while minimizing our presence among people who have no regard for either one, seems to be a sensible one to consider.

185 posted on 12/20/2007 4:19:22 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: bamahead; A. Morgan

On the bright side, Cynthia McKinney is running for President on the Green Party ticket. I wonder how many moonbat votes she’ll steal from the Dims? She is currently a moonbat darling. Let her be the cause of another Dim loss, and they’ll hate her as much as they hate Nader.


186 posted on 12/20/2007 4:23:58 PM PST by Purrcival (Democrats: The party of FAILURE. Can't hush Rush, can't impeach Bush, can't end the war, can't...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rineaux
The silliness turns people off but at the same time draws people to support Ron Paul.

As happened with another poster, incendiary remarks regarding Ron Paul caused me to investigate his positions on the issues. Not only did I find his detractors to misrepresent his positions, but they also have no way of articulating their own.

It's the same phenomenon demonstrated by Bush haters who have not taken time to study his resolve and reasoning. As a result I have become comfortable in defending Ron Paul's positions, if for no other reason than others cannot comprehend them (as is evident from their reaction).

187 posted on 12/20/2007 4:34:06 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

Same here....

here in Atlanta you see the occasional RuPaul placard on an overpass. Today I saw a pick-up with the tailgate down and a GIANT sign against the rear of the cab.

All other candidates manage with a bumper sticker, but not the loon’s candidate. It’s as if they’re trying to appeal to the blind as well as the dumb.


188 posted on 12/20/2007 4:37:13 PM PST by tpanther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Duchess47
Thanks for the post. I know Dr. Paul is a firm supporter of our troops, yet I wonder what he perceives to be an adequate troop level for the defense of our country. I also note that he has no qualms about our decision as a nation to enter into WWII. The threat from abroad was significant enough, of far greater magnitude than the rag-tag bastards who attacked us on 9/11.
189 posted on 12/20/2007 4:43:31 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Purrcival

The way I see it is, if Cynthia McKinney gets even 0.01% of any vote, it is a sad day for America.


190 posted on 12/20/2007 4:43:56 PM PST by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; The majority are satisfied with a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Neu Pragmatist
The Paulites hate when I suggest that Paul might be getting funds from Soros.

There is big money coming from somewhere ....

It is curous. I have to wonder if Soros is trying to get a third party run started. If so RP isn't the guy. He'd draw more from the left, IMO.

191 posted on 12/20/2007 4:47:40 PM PST by airborne (Proud to be a conservative! Proud to support Duncan Hunter for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

“OTOH, if another country came over here to establish their way of government in place of ours, and we attacked their interests in response, would you say they are right in attacking us further since we are, by their terms, “rattlesnakes?””

We have never entered another country just because they had a different culture or way of life.


192 posted on 12/20/2007 4:48:43 PM PST by DugwayDuke (Ron Paul - building a bridge to the 19th century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Perhaps not, but we’ve entered many countries without regard for either their culture or the consequences. If you think 9/11 happened just because some folks woke up one morning and decided on a whim to fly planes into our public and private buildings because we are a free people, then you might was well refrain from participating in meaningful discussion with regard to foreign policy.


193 posted on 12/20/2007 4:59:31 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
As happened with another poster, incendiary remarks regarding Ron Paul caused me to investigate his positions on the issues. Not only did I find his detractors to misrepresent his positions, but they also have no way of articulating their own.

LOL, because I posted just about the same reason why I became a supporter. As I wrote, these haters really don't know how well they are recruiting Freepers to take a serious look at RP.

If his position on the War was different, he would probably be leading in the polls.

I have listened to him these last couple of days, and I tell you the interviewers want to take him off his/the message. He is solid, when given the time, to get his point across. He answers the questions. No BS on his part.

There is a big concern Ron Paul is making too much sense to a lot of people, I expect the distortions to get even uglier then they have been already.

Despite the insults, you stayed above board. I some times get in the trenches and realize I am doing a disservice to my fellow Paul supporters.

Great to have you on board.

194 posted on 12/20/2007 5:04:39 PM PST by rineaux (How dare you, how dare you question the Clinton's wrecked record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

LMAO! Yeah I read that post, and then had to clear the spew off my screen when I read that! LOL

But yeah...walks like a duck, talks like a duck...

if I was a hypocrat, I’d be outright thrilled with Ru Paul running as a Republican. Dennis Kucinich too for that matter!

Maybe they can join forces...Paul/Kucinich ‘08

Maybe when Obama trots out Oprah they could answer by trotting out Cynthia McKooky...isn’t she running as a greenie or something these days?


195 posted on 12/20/2007 5:05:49 PM PST by tpanther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
There were WMD in Iraq. Saddam used them against the Kurds and the Iranians.

Back in the Eighties, twenty years ago. And some of it came from American sources. Remember BCCI and the S&L scandal where it was revealed that we were funding Saddam's war machine against Iran which was also used against the Kurds, probably as test subjects and because they had rebel elements against Saddam's regime?

So exactly why does Iran continue to enrich uranium?

So they can supply their domestic electricity and export all that high-dollar oil? Last I heard, Iranians like money like everyone else.
196 posted on 12/20/2007 5:05:53 PM PST by George W. Bush (Apres moi, le deluge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: All
His meteoric rise in fundraising has Clinton/Soros’s fingerprints all over it. Just enough to make noise, not enough to raise eyebrows.
Hillary has just about maxed out her current donor base and they probably suggested that the maxed out donors (people that gave the total amount allowable by law) funnel funds to Paul instead.
With a 49% negative, they need him or some other useful idiot to run as a 3rd party if she’s to stand a chance in the national election.
Don’t put anything past these people.
197 posted on 12/20/2007 5:06:22 PM PST by newnhdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

BTW, here is another post we were on along with the same haters.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-rlc/1942393/posts?q=1&;page=1


198 posted on 12/20/2007 5:07:22 PM PST by rineaux (How dare you, how dare you question the Clinton's wrecked record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

“If you think 9/11 happened just because some folks woke up one morning and decided on a whim to fly planes into our public and private buildings because we are a free people, then you might was well refrain from participating in meaningful discussion with regard to foreign policy.”

May I humbly suggest that you need to post something in breaking news informing all who enter free republic that you’ve been appointed doorkeeper for foreign policy discussion here on free republic. You might also wish to make all aware that they must accept Ron Paul’s peculiar delusions before being allowed to discuss foreign policy with their betters.

And, FYI, I do happen to think they flew those planes into our buildings because ‘we are free’. Yes, free, because we have not submitted to their version of Islam and because they see that ‘freedom’ as the largest impediment to the grandiose dreams of Muslim hegemony of the world.

“Perhaps not, but we’ve entered many countries without regard for either their culture or the consequences.”

There are consequences of our “entering” or “not entering any country”. Isolationism does not protect us from consequences.


199 posted on 12/20/2007 5:16:44 PM PST by DugwayDuke (Ron Paul - building a bridge to the 19th century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

This doesn’t answer my question. Al Qaeda in Iraq exists. What’s Ron Paul’s plan for dealing with them?


200 posted on 12/20/2007 5:22:30 PM PST by death2tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 341-350 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson