Replies

Sorry but the research on HIV and AIDS has progressed to the point that the Scientists working on it are either correct in their assumption or engaged in fraud on a massive scale. Not the Scientists like me who work in unrelated fields and accept their conclusions, I mean the actual Scientists working on the HIV virus. There is no possibility that they are just mistaken at this point, they are either essentially correct, or engaged in massive fraud.

I am not interested in debating a conspiracy theorist. I am perfectly willing to discuss Science, and debate the implications and meanings of the data. But if you think they are ‘Liars Liars Pants on Fire’ right from the beginning, while your granola eating anti-corporate raw foodist coffee enema having nutters are obviously truth-tellers of the highest order.

If you have data present it and I will engage it. Otherwise it is YOU who first backed down from defending the ASININE and IDIOTIC article at the head of this thread that cannot even keep translation and transcription differentiated to chase a red herring of HIV AIDS which has nothing to do with the subject.

I offered a debate between you and one of the thousands of scientists who officially question the HIV-AIDS hypothesis. The debate was going to be focused on the science of AIDS alone. You accepted the debate and then backed out. Furthermore, I cited paper after paper, written by your fellow evos, every one of which stated that there are indeed codes upon codes. Your issue is with them, not me. And in this connection, I also floated a debate between you and a creation scientist. As per usual, you failed to rise to the challenge. Thus, it is you who are running away, not me.

And finally, I must take exception to your misrepresentation of my views re: raw food, the free market, coffee enemas, etc. I do not advocated raw food, I am not anti-corporation, nor do I advocate coffee enemas. All your deliberate misrepresentations really underscore is your dishonest nature and your desperate attempt to distract attention away from the science that refutes your materialist fantasies.

In short, put up or shut up. But if it is your intention to cling to your world of fantasy, perhaps shutting up would be the better option.