There have been numerous accusations of this. But when I look back through this forum I find that 100% of the occurrences of this delusional accusation comes from a single source - yourself.
I can't figure you out. Sometimes you seem rational and logical. And then other times you make the most highly offensive, completely unsupported accusations towards people you know virtually zilch about. Is there some Jekyll & Hyde thingy here, that I should know about? Eg, morning vs night, or pre-coffee vs post-coffee?
There have been numerous accusations of this. But when I look back through this forum I find that 100% of the occurrences of this delusional accusation comes from a single source - yourself.
I can’t figure you out. Sometimes you seem rational and logical. And then other times you make the most highly offensive, completely unsupported accusations towards people you know virtually zilch about. Is there some Jekyll & Hyde thingy here, that I should know about? Eg, morning vs night, or pre-coffee vs post-coffee?
= = =
I’ll try and go back and dig it out of his writings. Perhaps someone will beat me to it.
Jekyll/Hyde . . . I don’t pretend to be free of my sin-nature per se. But I don’t believe what you describe is operating. Others are better judges of that.
Those closest to me over the years—including colleagues—have characterized me as the kindEST or one of the kindEST persons they’ve ever met. They also very humblingly characterize my discernment and perceptiveness about people to be similarly at the top of those they’ve known.
One of my most brilliant supervisors in my PhD program asserted in our group supervision meeting once that I took a few weeks to get as far as he got in 6-9 months with clients.
I’m also known as someone who can take a photo that shows well a person’s eyes and 80-97% of the time give a fairly accurate personality summary including major strengths and weaknesses.
All that to say—I don’t really have a lot of apologies about the skills God has fiery-furnace burned into and hammered into me and led me into.
Are those skills and perceptiveness-es flawless or flawlessly applied—certainly not. But they typically are characterized by others who should know as being markedly above average.
In terms of the evidence for my allegations . . . conjectures, hypotheses . . . the evidence is vividly in his writings. I’ll try and dig it out. But that’s mucking about muck that’s not at all very attractive, to me.
It’s much more my style to make the relevant points and try and point folks to learning principles that they can better apply in their lives.