Evidently your research is as flawed as your perceptiveness.
I can show two people who laughed at my posts. I've yet seen anybody say "hey Quix, I actually like all cap posts." This contradicts your last statement to me and proves you wrong. If you have evidence to the contrary, it is incumbent upon you to provide that evidence if denying my statements. If you did, I could say "you are correct, I didn't see that."
Just remember that I went after you when you referred to people who even politely told you that all cap posts are hard to read and not considered good manners as:
- childish
- irrational
- group-thinkers
- unconservative
If not directly, you implied it. I'm sure you called them other things too, but I'm too lazy at this point to go back and look.
It is not often that I choose to call people like you out. When I do, I don't back down. I bristle at overdeveloped egos, and like to beat them down. Yes, consider that a hobby, just as your hobby appears to be blathering on as an "expert" and dismissing others with your "I have a PhD" BS. I can be troll-like in this regard and make no apologies for it becasue people like you have your own tack for overly dominating a discussion while arrogantly dismissing others.
Anybody is free to psychoanalyze my intent, but regardless, your arrogance and brashness with others in the beginning is what I chose to attack. Would I do that in real life? Of course not. The Internet is interesting like that, in that it encourages this type of bravado.
Now, your hit and run silliness has made me out to be a liar, as I told one other poster that I was finished with you because I am now irritating others on the thread.
You are now free to post another meaningless one line like the one I am replying to here to avoid addressing the actual elements of the debate, if it makes you feel better and helps keep your alternate reality and your ego in order.