Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rudy Giuliani campaign team backtracks on tryst talk
NY DAILY NEWS ^ | November 30th 2007 | DAVID SALTONSTALL and MICHAEL SAUL

Posted on 11/30/2007 5:02:39 PM PST by neverdem

The uproar grew Thursday over expenses for Rudy Giuliani's protection during his trysts with Judith Nathan as his campaign's initial defense - that its accounting methods were the same as previous mayors' - unraveled.

Joe Lhota, a deputy mayor in Giuliani's City Hall, told the Daily News Wednesday night that the administration's practice of allocating security expenses to small city offices that had nothing to do with mayoral protection has "gone on for years" and "predates Giuliani."

When told budget officials from the administrations of Ed Koch and David Dinkins said they did no such thing, Lhota caved Thursday, "I'm going to reverse myself on that. I'm just going to talk about the Giuliani era," Lhota said. "I should only talk about what I know about."

The embarrassing backtrack comes as Giuliani rushed to network airwaves to defend himself against allegations his administration deliberately attempted to conceal the taxpayer cost of his NYPD protection while he engaged in secret Hamptons liaisons with Nathan, his then-mistress and current wife.

In interviews on CBS, ABC and CNN, Giuliani portrayed the allegations as a political "hit job" and "dirty trick" unleashed hours before a big Republican debate. The story was first reported Wednesday on the Politico.com Web site.

"This was really done to try to focus on my personal life," Giuliani said on ABC. "It was a perfectly appropriate set of expenses," he added on CNN.

"I was covered by the police for 24 hours a day, every day that I was mayor," Giuliani said. "I was covered because there were threats to kill me. Contracts back from when I was United States attorney, all kinds of things."

Denying any effort at concealment, he said, "All the billing is open - that's how you can find it."

As questions swirled about Giuliani's bookkeeping methods, others were focused on the potentially damaging political cost of the scandal.

Fran Reiter, former deputy mayor under Giuliani who is now supporting Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, said the biggest problem for him is the renewed spotlight on his adultery.

"Was there a corrupt activity? Were there expenditures that shouldn't have been expensed? Clearly no. The mayor has 24-hour, 365-day a year security. It should be paid for by taxpayer dollars," she said.

"The only political issue is any potential embarrassment because he was going out to Long Island to meet with Judith."

Records obtained by Politico.com through Freedom of Information laws showed for the first time this week how the Giuliani administration scattered travel costs totaling thousands of dollars among a slew of small city agencies, such as the Loft Board, which regulates the conversion of lofts in the city.

"I don't understand when it started. I don't understand why it started," Lhota said. "But I do know one thing: It was consistently done ... in no way shape or form did it imply a coverup."

Former Mayor Ed Koch and City Controller William Thompson, along with budget officials from the Koch and Dinkins eras as well as independent budget experts, described the bookkeeping practice as shoddy and wrong.

"It's simply an effort to fool the public," said Koch, a longtime Giuliani critic and supporter of Clinton. "I haven't got the slightest idea for his motivation other than it appears he wanted to disguise it so people wouldn't know what was happening. It's asinine."

Thompson, a Democrat, said the accounting practice "does not promote open government."

"It's not the way you want to see expenditures handled," Thompson said. "It creates just a more opaque, more difficult situation to track and to follow."

Dinkins declined Thursday to comment, but Carol O'Cleireacain, who served as his budget director, said Giuliani officials scattered expenses because they "didn't want anybody to know about it."

"This was the least transparent administration in a very long time," she said. "I have no trouble saying that."

Officials at the Independent Budget Office and the Citizens Budget Commission also slammed the practice, saying it severely undermines budget transparency.

Asked to respond to budget experts' criticism about the lack of transparency, Lhota replied, "They're out of their minds and you can quote me saying that."

"It's not a coverup," he said. "If you want lack of transparency, the costs would have been borne exclusively by the NYPD - it's total lack of transparency at the NYPD."

Thursday, a spokesman for Mayor Bloomberg appeared to back up Team Giuliani's assertion that all of the security money ultimately came from the NYPD.

"During the Giuliani administration, we believe that security expenses that were originally paid by the mayor's office were ultimately reimbursed by the Police Department," Bloomberg spokesman Stu Loeser said.

dsaltonstall@nydailynews.com


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: giuliani; giulianitruthfile; rudygiuliani
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

If Hillary gets elected President, I hope you enjoy paying for Charles Rangel’s tax reform.


21 posted on 11/30/2007 6:12:31 PM PST by Perdogg (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Devastating.

So, I'm wondering where Giuliani's support goes when it bleeds away. I can't see it going to Huckabee.

22 posted on 11/30/2007 6:14:12 PM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
If Hillary gets elected President, I hope you enjoy paying for Charles Rangel’s tax reform.

Free health care too under Hillary. YES!

23 posted on 11/30/2007 6:16:13 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
As I said before, if he broke city, state, or federal laws, he should have been prosecuted for it.

Obviously, Rudy hid and buried all these transactions in order to avoid being prosecuted. Maybe now that a lot of this stuff is coming out, he will be.

He's the type who might really enjoy living in a men's prison.

24 posted on 11/30/2007 6:16:26 PM PST by tear gas (Because of the 22nd Amendment, we are losing President. Bush. Can we afford to lose him now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

We don’t need a president who thinks that personally shuffling money around and hiding expenses among unrelated agencies is perfectly OK.

Not only is what he did wrong, but he obviously had to intimidate auditors to keep them from bringing it up/

It makes you wonder what kind of police force he would create as president and what agency’s funds he would raid to pay for it.


25 posted on 11/30/2007 6:17:44 PM PST by FreeInWV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
As I said before, if he broke city, state, or federal laws, he should have been prosecuted for it.

Well, he broke his marital vows to his 2nd wife. I guess breaking religious laws is less important than government laws.

26 posted on 11/30/2007 6:19:17 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tear gas

That’s silly. Since you cannot prove a crime, it must be only because the evidence was destroyed.


27 posted on 11/30/2007 6:19:53 PM PST by Perdogg (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The sad truth of Rooty’s sordid personal behavior emerges. Taxpayer funded bimbos make him the Republican version of Slick Willy.


28 posted on 11/30/2007 6:22:44 PM PST by 50mm (Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist - G. Carlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

That’s between Rudy and God, we don’t live in an Islamic Republic.


29 posted on 11/30/2007 6:23:21 PM PST by Perdogg (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Well, you know - no controlling legal authority.


30 posted on 11/30/2007 6:27:09 PM PST by TitansAFC ("My 80% enemy is not my 20% friend" -- Common Sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
LOL. It isn't MY job to prove a crime. It may be, though, that there will now evidence for people who do prosecute crimes back there. It reminds me a lot of the Duke Cunningham mess. I recall him also saying that no one would be able to prove he was engaged in criminal misconduct.

And, beyond that, I think you're making a mistake if you think the American people are going to be impressed by a candidate's claim that this clear abuse of his position must be excused unless he is first convicted of a crime. I think Rudy's candidacy is effectively over.

And that's the way God wants it.

31 posted on 11/30/2007 6:27:12 PM PST by tear gas (Because of the 22nd Amendment, we are losing President. Bush. Can we afford to lose him now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
That’s between Rudy and God, we don’t live in an Islamic Republic.

He's running for the world's most powerful office. So it's relevant.

If he was Joe Blow from the street I wouldn't give a feces.

32 posted on 11/30/2007 6:29:28 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Well, you know - no controlling legal authority.

Yeah but that magical R label works wonders. Kind of like what spinach does for Popeye.

33 posted on 11/30/2007 6:30:24 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"I was covered because there were threats to kill me. Contracts back from when I was United States attorney, all kinds of things."

Really? Serious, credible threats? I'd love to see some evidence of that.

Were there threats to kill your mistress, too? Is that why she was offered the NYPD as her personal taxi service?

34 posted on 11/30/2007 6:30:25 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tear gas

Rudy was visiting Judith in South Hampton on these little trysts. Is that one of the toney Hamptons, home of the super rich and famous? How did Judith afford a home there? I thought she was a nurse from a coal town in Pennsylvania. Did Rudy set her up in a little love nest that he paid for? Just wondering.


35 posted on 11/30/2007 6:31:25 PM PST by WestSylvanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
"Who cares about his personal life? I don’t. If he had broken the law, he should have been charged"

This isn't about his personal life.

The city should not be paying protection for his girl-friend while he is married, period!.

At best this just shows the complete lack of ethics by Rudy,at worst, it is a case of embezzlement as he was charging the city for protection services for his girl-friend that should never have occured.

Disclaimer, I am not familiar with NYC law on this matter.
36 posted on 11/30/2007 6:32:31 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Who cares about his personal life?

If he uses taxpayer dollars to fund his folly, I care.

37 posted on 11/30/2007 6:33:28 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WestSylvanian
Did Rudy set her up in a little love nest that he paid for?

I think it's safe to assume that. Apparently, Rudy also had a love nest with Bernie Kerik near ground zero.

38 posted on 11/30/2007 6:34:34 PM PST by tear gas (Because of the 22nd Amendment, we are losing President. Bush. Can we afford to lose him now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

It’s looking more and more like Rudy is a Republican version of the Clinton’s.

I guess when he said that his policies were almost identical to Bill Clinton he really wasn’t lying, was he!


39 posted on 11/30/2007 6:34:57 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; OAKC0N; time4good; Mike32; genxer; PatriotEdition; Simul iustus et peccator; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic Ping List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.

I’m pro-choice. I’m pro-gay rights, Giuliani said. He was then asked whether he supports a ban on what critics call partial-birth abortions. “No, I have not supported that, and I don’t see my position on that changing,” he responded. Source: CNN.com, “Inside Politics” Dec 2, 1999 http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Rudy_Giuliani_Abortion.htm

ANDERSON COOPER 360 DEGREES (November 14, 2006)

RUDY GIULIANI (R), FORMER MAYOR OF NEW YORK CITY: I'm pro- choice. I'm pro-gay rights.

KING: Giuliani supports a woman's right to an abortion, and back in 1999, he opposed a federal ban on late-term abortions.

GIULIANI: No, I have not supported that, and I don't see my position on that changing.

KING: Immigration could be another presidential landmine. Back in 1996, Mayor Giuliani went to federal court to challenge new federal laws requiring the city to inform the federal government about illegal immigrants.

JEFFREY: He took the side of illegal immigrants in New York City against the Republican Congress.

KING: Giuliani opposes same-sex marriage but as mayor, he supported civil unions and extending health and other benefits to gay couples. He also supported the assault weapons ban and other gun control measures opposed by the National Rifle Association.

GIULIANI: I'm in favor of gun control. I'm pro-choice.

Republican Big-Wigs Support Pro-Abortion Event in NY

Pro-abortion Governor George Pataki and New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who also supports unrestricted abortion, are co-chairs of the 2000 Choice Award Presentation to be held on May 30 at the St. Regis Hotel in New York City. The event is sponsored by the Republican Pro-Choice Coalition, a group that is campaigning for the removal of the pro-life plank from the Republican National Platform.


http://www.nationalreview.com/murdock/murdock200503010743.asp


40 posted on 11/30/2007 6:36:55 PM PST by narses (...the spirit of Trent is abroad once more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson