Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rollo tomasi
Tariffs/slavery = the South's economic interest.

If protective tariffs were such a bone of contention then why was one of the first acts of the confederate congress the adoption of a protective tariff?

231 posted on 11/20/2007 5:23:08 AM PST by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
Easy, they needed income to pay for war.

In the seemingly hypocritical South’s case, the income collected would be controlled by “them” instead of the “Union” which they thought had it out for them.

If your perceived “enemy” was collecting “taxes” from your labor and using those “taxes” to beef themselves up I guess you would get pissed. This was there main sticking point, how the dollars were distributed.

232 posted on 11/20/2007 5:31:33 AM PST by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur

Whoops forgot, why did many “free traders” vote for higher tariffs after the South split? Same exact reason, to raise revenue quickly to fight.


233 posted on 11/20/2007 5:34:09 AM PST by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson