Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vbmoneyspender
Remember what Rummy had to say ? Recall W's endorsement of Rumsfeld and the opinion of the generals in country at that time who suggested no additional troops were required ?
No opponent of the Iraq war, I. How its been prosecuted is giving me heartburn, tho.
45 posted on 10/18/2007 9:24:21 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Eric in the Ozarks
I'll quote again what Petraeus had to say about our original strategy.

[Petraeus] then reflected on the past strategy. “For a variety of reasons, some pretty good reasons, we were gradually consolidating in larger bases and handing off to the Iraqis. The transition to Iraqi Security Forces, Iraqi control and local control was emphasized heavily. That was sort of moving along reasonably well until it was really undone by the bombing of that mosque and the resulting sectarian violence.

My question about the timing of the Anbar Awakening was intended to point out that given that the Awakening occurred before the surge, putting an additional 30,000 troops into Iraq was not a precondition to obtaining a significant breakthrough in the war.

48 posted on 10/18/2007 9:29:37 AM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson