Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reaganaut1

The numbers are cooked and crooked. Even if they are correct, what’s the statistical difference between 67.6 percent and 67 percent, or for that matter, 700,000 “people”. My estimation is that something on the order of 300,000 people lost their homes during Katrina/Rita. How many have repurchased? How many people are simply “in transit”?


9 posted on 10/08/2007 6:10:04 AM PDT by glide625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: glide625
Homeownership Rates for the U.S. and Regions: 1965 to Present
18 posted on 10/08/2007 6:18:00 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: glide625
How many people are simply “in transit”?

Just as it is impossible to have full employment; i.e., 100% employment, there is probably also a ceiling on full "home ownership." The NYT could've done a much better job by placing this in perspective, rather than draw some disastrous historical picture to slam the president.

23 posted on 10/08/2007 6:31:40 AM PDT by Lou L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: glide625

It’s also worth noting that a substantial portion of the population growth in the last six years has probably involved people entering this country illegally. These people are far more likely to rent their homes than own them.


41 posted on 10/08/2007 7:07:03 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson