Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Unknowing

yes, hency my statement about a bankrupt who can afford it.

HOWEVER, an adversary is not always needed (at least pre2005) if you had a lender who was willing to negotiate and see the futility of their position.

What I have seen of late is lenders who have no clue about business and are in a “screw everyone” mindset.

While the 2005 reform only managed to increase ch13’s very slightly, I think the trend to more plans than liquidation is going to force trustees to get into the stripping mix in order to preserve the income source for the other creditors.


48 posted on 10/08/2007 7:31:44 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory

The Trustees are so overloaded that it would require some new case law to mandate such actions, IMHO.


60 posted on 10/08/2007 11:19:29 AM PDT by Unknowing (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson