Rudy Looking Dangerously Presidential ... (he makes Bill Clinton look stable)

Human Events ^ | 09/19/2007 | Doug Patton

[Eagles Talon IV]

My comment was not at all ridiculous. I meant it and will always consider the greater good over my personal feelings.

I love Bush for most of what he has done. There are a few areas I disagree with him just as there are areas I disagree with RG. But the things that NOW, TODAY are the most important would cause me to vote for him. I repeat, I would vote for whomever is the nominee and i think most any of them except Paul would make a fine president so far as prosecuting the WOT, which, again, is the primary issue NOW, TODAY.

NO, we don’t need a liberal to save us, we need ANYONE who can beat fatso.

[Eagles Talon IV]

Disagreeing with someone is RUDE? Who are you, the PC police? Get over yourself.

[wagglebee]

I’m sensing a pattern here.

Monday and Tuesday, the WAnkers sent Hildy in to be disruptive, today they send Eagles Talon.

Things sure must have gone to crap in a hurry over in WAnkerville.

[trisham]

More of the same, I see. Evidently, I was right.

[dforest]

Oh thats right! Thank you for the reminder.

Hillary has these folks wrapped around her finger.

They have the ultimate faith in Hillary. They drank the Rooty kool aid and he is the only one that can ride in on his donkey to save them.

[Eagles Talon IV]

I suppose any statement made on an issue that you won’t budge on and that contradicts yours is ridiculous. So be it. Frankly I don’t believe you understand a single thing I've said, so caught up in your quest for a “perfect and pure conservative”.

[trisham]

So it seems.

[Politicalmom]

NOBODY could make Giuliani palatable for me.

I will NEVER vote for him.

[Eagles Talon IV]

liberal=a descent into name calling and a demonstrable lack of civility when contradicted.

[dforest]

Frankly my dear. I don’t give a damn. You and your Rooty toots are here to push the same old tired excuses that Rooty is the only one.

Yawn.

[trisham]

liberal=a descent into name calling and a demonstrable lack of civility when contradicted.

*************

Excellent. Admitting the problem is the first step to recovery. Good for you.

[Knitebane]

Rudy is electable.

Since when?

No, really.

When was the last time that a "moderate" Republican beat a Democrat in a presidential election?

I discount George I as he was the hand-picked successor of Reagan. Everyone wanted to believe he was as conservative as the Gipper and when he turned out not to be he was abandoned in the next election.

FACT: When the public has a choice between a Democrat and a moderate Republican (Democrat-light) they always choose the real thing.

Backing Rudy for president is a sure fire way to get Hillary elected.

[wagglebee]

liberal=a descent into name calling and a demonstrable lack of civility when contradicted.

Yes, we are all well aware that liberals dislike being called liberals and prefer terms such as "centrist."

[wagglebee]

When was the last time that a "moderate" Republican beat a Democrat in a presidential election?

Here's a better one, when was the last time someone won the presidential election without winning their own state? Because there is no way that Rooty takes NY.

The answer is NEVER.

[Badeye]

I can’t vote for this man, no matter the consequences. He’s got the same disease Bill Clinton has, one that causes him to do stupid things in his ‘free time’ when bored.

No thanks.

[IrishMike]

http://hytaipan.home.comcast.net/media/serenity2.html

[wagglebee]

It could be that the WAnkers are requiring that certain WAnkers be banned from FR.

[trisham]

There are some posters who lately seem intent on walking off a cliff.

[Knitebane]

I've been trying to get this point across for months.

Rudy can't win. Anyone that thinks otherwise can't remember history and will therefore repeat it.

[dirtboy]

So you are a pimp, then? Who are you pimping?

I guess Rudy boosting and logical fallocies go hand in hand.